Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31897668›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2020

A novel, 4-h DNA extraction method for STR typing of casework bone samples.

Laila Hasap, Wilaiwan Chotigeat, Jintana Pradutkanchana, Uraporn Vongvatcharanon, Thitika Kitpipit, Phuvadol Thanakiatkrai

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Laila HasapDepartment of Molecular Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Faculty of Science, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, 90112, Thailand.
Wilaiwan ChotigeatDepartment of Molecular Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Faculty of Science, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, 90112, Thailand.
Jintana PradutkanchanaForensic Medicine and Toxicology Unit, Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, 90112, Thailand.
Uraporn VongvatcharanonDepartment of Anatomy, Faculty of Science, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, 90112, Thailand.
Thitika KitpipitForensic Science Program, Department of Applied Science, Faculty of Science, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, 90112, Thailand.
Phuvadol ThanakiatkraiForensic Science Program, Department of Applied Science, Faculty of Science, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, 90112, Thailand. pthanakiatkrai@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2518-8244
Prince of Songkla University · TH

Funding

Ph.D. Studies Thailand's Education Hub for ASEAN Countries Scholarship 2015 -Prince of Songkla University (National Research Council of Thailand) SCI6201021S
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bones are often found in mass grave crime scene. To increase DNA identification success rates, a highly efficient DNA extraction method should be selected. Several DNA extraction methods for human bones have been published yet never been systematically compared, and some are time-consuming or complex. As such, a quick and highly efficient DNA extraction method was developed and compared with three published methods (Hi-Flow silica-based, total demineralization (TD) and PrepFiler BTA) using 70 fresh and 22 casework bones from different body parts. The highest median DNA concentrations were obtained from developed method (135.85 ng/μL and 0.224 ng/μL for fresh and casework bones, respectively). For residual PCR inhibitors, the threshold cycle (Ct) of the internal positive control (IPC) showed that developed method and PrepFiler BTA removed most PCR inhibitors. Similarly, 95.45% of casework STR profiles obtained using the developed protocol meet the standard requirements for Australian National Criminal Investigative DNA Database (NCIDD) entry, followed by 86.35% using TD, 81.82% using PrepFiler BTA, and 45.45% using Hi-Flow. Additionally, DNA extracts from seven different bones revealed that the 1

Indexed as

Microsatellite RepeatsBone and BonesBone DensityDNADNA FingerprintingFemurFinger PhalangesForensic GeneticsHumansTibiaDNABone typeDNA analysisDNA extractionSkeletal remainsSTR typing

Identifiers

PMID31897668
OpenAlexW2996851333

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.