Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31897412›Full record

ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2019

Patient-Reported Knee Outcome Scores With Soft Tissue Quadriceps Tendon Autograft Are Similar to Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Autograft at Minimum 2-Year Follow-up: A Retrospective Single-Center Cohort Study in Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Surgery.

Jose R Perez, Christopher P Emerson, Carlos M Barrera, Dylan N Greif, William H Cade, Lee D Kaplan, Michael G Baraga

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Evaluation of Failed ACL Reconstruction: An Updated Review.Open access journal of sports medicine · 2024
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with all-soft tissue quadriceps tendon versus quadriceps tendon with bone block.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Returning Athletes to Sports Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jose R PerezUniversity of Miami Sports Medicine Institute, Coral Gables, Florida, USA.
Christopher P EmersonUniversity of Miami Sports Medicine Institute, Coral Gables, Florida, USA.
Carlos M BarreraUniversity of Miami Sports Medicine Institute, Coral Gables, Florida, USA.
Dylan N GreifUniversity of Miami Sports Medicine Institute, Coral Gables, Florida, USA.
William H CadeUniversity of Miami Sports Medicine Institute, Coral Gables, Florida, USA.
Lee D KaplanUniversity of Miami Sports Medicine Institute, Coral Gables, Florida, USA.
Michael G BaragaUniversity of Miami Sports Medicine Institute, Coral Gables, Florida, USA.
University of Miami · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundQuadriceps tendon (QT)-bone autografts used during anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction have provided comparable outcomes and decreased donor-site morbidity when compared with bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) autografts. No study has directly compared the outcomes of the all-soft tissue QT autograft with that of the BPTB autograft. HYPOTHESIS: Patient-reported knee outcome scores and rates of postoperative complication after primary ACL reconstruction with QT autografts are no different from BPTB autografts at a minimum 2-year follow-up. STUDY

designCohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

methodsA total of 75 patients who underwent primary autograft ACL reconstruction with QT or BPTB autografts between January 1, 2015, and March 31, 2016, at a single hospital center were contacted by telephone and asked to complete the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Evaluation, Tegner activity level scale, and Lysholm knee scoring scale. Information about the subsequent surgeries performed on the operative knee was also collected. Statistical analysis was performed using the Kruskal-Wallis test and the Fisher exact test for categorical data.

resultsFifty patients (28 QT, 22 BPTB) completed the surveys at a mean follow-up of 33.04 months (range, 24-44 months). For the QT versus the BPTB group respectively, the median IKDC scores were 94.83 (interquartile range [IQR], 7.61) versus 94.83 (IQR, 10.92) (

conclusionThere was no statistical difference in patient-reported knee outcomes or graft complication rates between the QT and BPTB autograft groups at a minimum 2-year follow-up after primary ACL reconstruction. This study highlights that the all-soft tissue QT autograft may be a suitable graft choice for primary ACL reconstruction.

Indexed as

all–soft tissue quadriceps tendon autograftanterior cruciate ligament reconstructionbone–patellar tendon–bone autograftquad tendon anterior cruciate ligament

Identifiers

PMID31897412
PMCPMC6918041
OpenAlexW2996732796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.