Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31897292›Full record

ArticleInterface focus2020

Effects of regional differences and demography in modelling foot-and-mouth disease in cattle at the national scale.

Kimberly Tsao, Stefan Sellman, Lindsay M Beck-Johnson, Deedra J Murrieta, Clayton Hallman, Tom Lindström, Ryan S Miller, Katie Portacci, Michael J Tildesley, Colleen T Webb

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Interface focus, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Kimberly TsaoDepartment of Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1878, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5616-1888
Stefan SellmanDepartment of Physics, Chemistry and Biology, Division of Theoretical Biology, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Lindsay M Beck-JohnsonDepartment of Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1878, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7247-0309
Deedra J MurrietaDepartment of Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1878, USA.
Clayton HallmanDepartment of Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1878, USA.
Tom LindströmDepartment of Physics, Chemistry and Biology, Division of Theoretical Biology, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Ryan S MillerUSDA APHIS Veterinary Services, Center for Epidemiology and Animal Health, Fort Collins, CO, USA.
Katie PortacciUSDA APHIS Veterinary Services, Center for Epidemiology and Animal Health, Fort Collins, CO, USA.
Michael J TildesleyThe Zeeman Institute for Systems Biology and Infectious Disease Epidemiology Research, School of Life Sciences and Mathematics Institute, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Colleen T WebbDepartment of Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1878, USA.
Colorado State University · USAnimal and Plant Health Inspection Service · USLinköping University · SEUniversity of Warwick · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) is a fast-spreading viral infection that can produce large and costly outbreaks in livestock populations. Transmission occurs at multiple spatial scales, as can the actions used to control outbreaks. The US cattle industry is spatially expansive, with heterogeneous distributions of animals and infrastructure. We have developed a model that incorporates the effects of scale for both disease transmission and control actions, applied here in simulating FMD outbreaks in US cattle. We simulated infection initiating in each of the 3049 counties in the contiguous US, 100 times per county. When initial infection was located in specific regions, large outbreaks were more likely to occur, driven by infrastructure and other demographic attributes such as premises clustering and number of cattle on premises. Sensitivity analyses suggest these attributes had more impact on outbreak metrics than the ranges of estimated disease parameter values. Additionally, although shipping accounted for a small percentage of overall transmission, areas receiving the most animal shipments tended to have other attributes that increase the probability of large outbreaks. The importance of including spatial and demographic heterogeneity in modelling outbreak trajectories and control actions is illustrated by specific regions consistently producing larger outbreaks than others.

Indexed as

cullinggeographical scalemovement banssensitivity analysissimulationvaccination

Identifiers

PMID31897292
PMCPMC6936011
OpenAlexW2994691210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.