Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31897276›Full record

ArticleOrthopedic reviews2019

How well does synovial fluid gram staining correlate with cultures in native joint infections?

Herbert Gbejuade, Mohamed Elsakka, Lucy Cutler

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orthopedic reviews, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. [Early diagnosis of a case of septic arthritis thanks to the BioFire® joint infection panel].Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Effect of Preoperative Antibiotic Therapy on Operative Culture Yield for Diagnosis of Native Joint Septic Arthritis.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2024
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Rapid Diagnostics of Joint Infections Using IS-Pro.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2023
    Article
  14. Enhancing Diagnostics in Orthopedic Infections.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Herbert GbejuadeUniversity Hospitals of Leicester, UK.
Mohamed ElsakkaUniversity Hospitals of Leicester, UK.
Lucy CutlerUniversity Hospitals of Leicester, UK.
University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of Gram staining of synovial fluid aspirated from native joints suspected to be infected, we reviewed results of synovial fluid Gram stain and cultures. The sensitivity and specificity of the synovial Gram stain were then calculated. From the 1067 consecutive synovial fluid samples evaluated, 830 samples fulfilled the set criteria. From these 830 synovial fluid samples, organisms were detected by culture technique in only 100 samples; most of which were Gram-positive bacteria (78%). The other 22% comprised Gram-negative bacteria, Fungi and a mixture of growth. Of these, concomitant Gram stain test revealed sensitivity and specificity of 17.0% and 99.7% respectively. Our study demonstrates that the Gram stain technique has low sensitivity in detecting organisms in presumed native joint infections. Our findings demonstrate that the Gram stain test is an unreliable investigation in diagnosing native joint infections.

Indexed as

CulturesGramstainInfectionJointNative

Identifiers

PMID31897276
PMCPMC6912140
OpenAlexW2992299455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.