Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31897263›Full record

ArticlePharmacy practice

Use of secret simulated patient followed by workshop based education to assess and improve inhaler counseling in community pharmacy in Jordan.

Eman R Elayeh, Eman A Hammad, Razan H Tubeileh, Iman A Basheti

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmacy practice. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Feasibility of using simulated patients for onsite structured practice feedback in Jordanian community pharmacy settings.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Eman R ElayehMSc. Department of Biopharmaceutics and Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, University of Jordan. Amman (Jordan). e.elayeh@ju.edu.jo.ORCID 0000-0002-9406-1597
Eman A HammadPhD. Department of Biopharmaceutics and Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, University of Jordan. Amman (Jordan). e.hammad@ju.edu.jo.ORCID 0000-0003-2059-6473
Razan H TubeilehMSc. School of Pharmacy, Middle East University. Amman (Jordan). rtubeileh@meu.edu.jo.ORCID 0000-0002-7359-3172
Iman A BashetiPhD. Department of Clinical Pharmacy & Therapeutics, Faculty of Pharmacy, Applied Science Private University. Amman (Jordan). dr_iman@asu.edu.jo.ORCID 0000-0002-8460-1158
University of Jordan · JOApplied Science Private University · JOMiddle East University · JO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo assess inhaler technique demonstration skills of community pharmacists located in Amman, Jordan via incorporating the trained secret simulated patient (SSP) approach. Secondly, to evaluate the effectiveness of a 2-hour educational workshop focused on SSP feedback.

methodsThis cross-sectional study involved community pharmacies located in Amman, Jordan. Initially, a trained SSP was involved to enact baseline visits requesting advice on how to use Ventolin® (a pressurized metered-dose inhaler; pMDI) and Pulmicort® (a Turbohaler inhaler, TH). Immediately after each visit, the SSP completed an inhaler technique evaluation form with inhaler checklists based on previously published checklists (consisting of 9 and 10 items for pMDI and TH respectively). The SSP invited all participating pharmacists to a 2-hour workshop that included feedback on their demonstration skills, and the second evaluation of their inhaler technique. The workshop included a summary of the initial visits' results highlighting pharmacists' performance.

resultsSixty pharmacies were visited and 120 inhaler assessments were completed. During baseline assessment, pharmacists scored an average of 4.5 out of 9 for pMDI and 4.9 out of 10 for TH. Only 11 pharmacists (18.3%) attended the workshop. During the workshop, inhaler technique demonstration skills significantly improved, as scores improved from 5.4 (SD 1.6) to 7.8 (SD 0.9) (p=0.008) and from 4.6 (SD 2.5) to 9.9 (SD 0.6) (p=0.003) for pMDI and TH respectively.

conclusionsThe SSP approach revealed a lack of ability to demonstrate correct inhaler technique for pMDI and TH inhalers by community pharmacists in Amman, Jordan. A focused educational workshop based on SSP feedback improved inhaler technique significantly.

Indexed as

AdministrationChecklistCommunity Pharmacy ServicesCross-Sectional StudiesDry Powder InhalersInhalationJordanMetered Dose InhalersPatient Education as TopicPatient SimulationPharmaciesPharmacistsProfessional Practice

Identifiers

PMID31897263
PMCPMC6935540
OpenAlexW2995848352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.