Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31897246›Full record

ArticleJournal of Cancer2020

Evaluation of different scoring systems and gene mutations for the prognosis of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) in Chinese population.

Meng-Yi Du, Min Xu, Jun Deng, Lin Liu, Tao Guo, Ling-Hui Xia, Yu Hu, Heng Mei

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. [Prognostic significance red blood cell distribution width in myelodysplastic syndromes].Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi · 2022
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Prognostic Markers of Myelodysplastic Syndromes.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Meng-Yi DuInstitute of Hematology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China.
Min XuInstitute of Hematology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China.
Jun DengInstitute of Hematology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China.
Lin LiuInstitute of Hematology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China.
Tao GuoInstitute of Hematology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China.
Ling-Hui XiaInstitute of Hematology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China.
Yu HuInstitute of Hematology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China.
Heng MeiInstitute of Hematology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China.
Union Hospital · CNHuazhong University of Science and Technology · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

MDS is a heterogeneous disease with diverse clinical manifestations, and an effective prognostic evaluation tool for MDS patients is needed. To achieve more accurate prognosis assessment for Chinese MDS patients, here we examined several scoring systems and explored the implications of gene mutations. The prognostic conditions were stratified against three different score systems (International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS), WHO Prognostic Scoring System (WPSS), and Revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-R)) were retrospectively applied to 110 de novo MDS patients in study cohort in our hospital and the prognostic conditions were stratified respectively. IPSS-R out-performed the others, since it had less overlaps in survival curve, especially in the relatively low-risk group. Furthermore, genetic mutations were identified in 84 out of 110 patients and their association with overall survival (OS) were determined. Among them, sixty-three percent patients had at least one-point mutation, including thirty-five patients with normal karyotypes. The presence of TP53 mutations, but not TET2, DNMT3A or ASXL1 mutations was significantly correlated with shorter OS. A new model incorporating IPSS-R and TP53 mutations into survival analysis was proposed, and the prognostic value of this model was validated to be predominant in a 190-primary MDS patient independent cohort. Our data suggested that IPSS-R was more suitable for Chinese population. Attentions should be paid to the unfavourable mutations that might exert impact on the survival, especially in patients with relatively low risk.

Indexed as

gene mutationsmyelodysplastic syndromeprognosisrisk assessment

Identifiers

PMID31897246
PMCPMC6930433
OpenAlexW2992438210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.