ArticleJournal of Cancer2020
Evaluation of different scoring systems and gene mutations for the prognosis of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) in Chinese population.
Article in Journal of Cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Hotspot gene mutations and treatment response in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS): predictive biomarkers and targeted strategies.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
- Higher prevalence of poor prognostic markers at a younger age in adult patients with myelodysplastic syndrome - evaluation of a large cohort in India.Molecular cytogenetics · 2024Article
- Prognostic impact of DTA mutation and co-occurring mutations in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome.Molecular biology reports · 2024Article
- [Prognostic significance red blood cell distribution width in myelodysplastic syndromes].Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi · 2022Article
- Personalized Risk Schemes and Machine Learning to Empower Genomic Prognostication Models in Myelodysplastic Syndromes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Decreased serum apolipoprotein A1 level predicts poor prognosis of patients with de novo myelodysplastic syndromes.BMC cancer · 2022Article
- Article
- Prognostic Markers of Myelodysplastic Syndromes.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
MDS is a heterogeneous disease with diverse clinical manifestations, and an effective prognostic evaluation tool for MDS patients is needed. To achieve more accurate prognosis assessment for Chinese MDS patients, here we examined several scoring systems and explored the implications of gene mutations. The prognostic conditions were stratified against three different score systems (International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS), WHO Prognostic Scoring System (WPSS), and Revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-R)) were retrospectively applied to 110 de novo MDS patients in study cohort in our hospital and the prognostic conditions were stratified respectively. IPSS-R out-performed the others, since it had less overlaps in survival curve, especially in the relatively low-risk group. Furthermore, genetic mutations were identified in 84 out of 110 patients and their association with overall survival (OS) were determined. Among them, sixty-three percent patients had at least one-point mutation, including thirty-five patients with normal karyotypes. The presence of TP53 mutations, but not TET2, DNMT3A or ASXL1 mutations was significantly correlated with shorter OS. A new model incorporating IPSS-R and TP53 mutations into survival analysis was proposed, and the prognostic value of this model was validated to be predominant in a 190-primary MDS patient independent cohort. Our data suggested that IPSS-R was more suitable for Chinese population. Attentions should be paid to the unfavourable mutations that might exert impact on the survival, especially in patients with relatively low risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.