Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31897171›Full record

ArticleOncology letters2020

Complete radiological response following subtotal resection in three glioblastoma patients under treatment with Tumor Treating Fields.

Almuth Friederike Kessler, Thomas Linsenmann, Thomas Westermaier, Wanja Wolber, Judith Weiland, Camelia-Maria Monoranu, Maria Breun, Carsten Hagemann, Ralf-Ingo Ernestus, Mario Löhr

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncology letters, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Electrotherapies for Glioblastoma.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Almuth Friederike KesslerDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Würzburg, Würzburg 97080, Germany.
Thomas LinsenmannDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Würzburg, Würzburg 97080, Germany.
Thomas WestermaierDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Würzburg, Würzburg 97080, Germany.
Wanja WolberDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Würzburg, Würzburg 97080, Germany.
Judith WeilandDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Würzburg, Würzburg 97080, Germany.
Camelia-Maria MonoranuDepartment of Neuropathology, Institute of Pathology, University of Würzburg, Würzburg 97080, Germany.
Maria BreunDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Würzburg, Würzburg 97080, Germany.
Carsten HagemannDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Würzburg, Würzburg 97080, Germany.
Ralf-Ingo ErnestusDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Würzburg, Würzburg 97080, Germany.
Mario LöhrDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Würzburg, Würzburg 97080, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) treatment consists of surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy with Temozolomide (TMZ). After subtotal resection (STR), residual tumors rarely undergo spontaneous regression. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) are reduced when compared with gross total resection. There is evidence that adding Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) to standard management may lead to a significant increase in PFS and OS. In 2015 and 2016, STR was performed in 27 patients with GBM. Of these, four subsequently received TTFields therapy in addition to chemotherapy. The present study presents a series of three patients with GBM (44-54 years; isocitrate dehydrogenase wild-type, methylated O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase promoter) that were treated with radiochemotherapy and TTFields after STR. Therapy with TTFields started concomitantly to TMZ following radiotherapy and was maintained for 14, 24 and 37 months. TTFields were used as monotherapy in one case, as TMZ treatment had to be stopped due to toxicity for 1 month. In all patients, TTFields therapy was well tolerated at high compliance levels, resulting in complete response (CR) after 4, 5 and 7 months, respectively. Two patients remain tumor-free at 16 and 40 months after STR. One patient exhibited multifocal recurrence 11 months after the beginning of TTFields treatment but remains alive, presenting a mild neurological decline 24 months after starting TTFields. All three presented patients gave written informed consent for their data to be published. In conclusion, the current report detailed three patients with GBM who underwent STR and were subsequently treated with TMZ and TTFields. TTFields treatment was tolerated well and was applied accurately and with high compliance by these patients, which may have contributed to the complete response. Four of the 27 patients treated with STR received additional TTFields treatment. Three of these 4 showed a CR, while a CR was observed only 2 of the remaining 23 patients without TTFields. The current series supports the effects in clinical practice, as demonstrated in recent clinical trials. The results also demonstrated that adjuvant TTFields therapy can structurally affect residual tumors after STR.

Indexed as

complete responseglioblastoma multiformeincomplete resectionsubtotal resectionTumor Treating Fields

Identifiers

PMID31897171
PMCPMC6924031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.