Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31896684›Full record

ArticleHaematologica2021

Measurable residual disease monitoring provides insufficient lead-time to prevent morphologic relapse in the majority of patients with core-binding factor acute myeloid leukemia.

Robert Puckrin, Eshetu G Atenafu, Jaime O Claudio, Steven Chan, Vikas Gupta, Dawn Maze, Caroline McNamara, Tracy Murphy, Andre C Shuh, Karen Yee and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Haematologica, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Acute Myeloid Leukemia-Use of Measurable Residual Disease to Improve Outcomes.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025
    Review
  7. Mutation- and MRD-informed treatment decisions for the transplant-eligible AML patient.Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Haematologica · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Robert PuckrinPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
Eshetu G AtenafuDeo. of Biostatistics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto.
Jaime O ClaudioPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto.
Steven ChanPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto.
Vikas GuptaPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
Dawn MazePrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
Caroline McNamaraPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
Tracy MurphyPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto.
Andre C ShuhPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
Karen YeePrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
Hassan SibaiPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
Mark D MindenPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
Cuihong WeiPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
Tracy StockleyPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
Suzanne Kamel-ReidPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
Aaron D SchimmerPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Core-binding factor acute myeloid leukemia is characterized by t(8;21) or inv(16) and the fusion proteins RUNX1-RUNX1T1 and CBFB-MYH11. International guidelines recommend monitoring for measurable residual disease every 3 months for 2 years after treatment. However, it is unknown if serial molecular monitoring can predict and prevent morphologic relapse. We conducted a retrospective single-center study of 114 patients in complete remission who underwent molecular monitoring with RT-qPCR of RUNX1-RUNX1T1 or CBFB-MYH11 transcripts every 3 months. Morphologic relapse was defined as re-emergence of >5% blasts and molecular relapse as ≥1 log increase in transcript level between 2 samples. Over a median follow-up time of 3.7 years (range 0.2-14.3), remission persisted in 71 (62.3%) patients but 43 (37.7%) developed molecular or morphologic relapse. Patients who achieved <3 log reduction in RUNX1-RUNX1T1 or CBFB-MYH11 transcripts at end of chemotherapy had a significantly higher risk of relapse compared to patients who achieved ≥3 log reduction (61.1% vs. 33.7%, p=0.004). The majority of relapses (74.4%, n=32) were not predicted by molecular monitoring and occurred rapidly with <100 days from molecular to morphologic relapse. Molecular monitoring enabled the detection of impending relapse and permitted pre-emptive intervention prior to morphologic relapse in only 11 (25.6%) patients. The current practice of molecular monitoring every 3 months provided insufficient lead-time to identify molecular relapses and prevent morphologic relapse in the majority of patients with core-binding factor acute myeloid leukemia treated at our institution. Further research is necessary to determine the optimal monitoring strategies for these patients.

Indexed as

Leukemia, Myeloid, AcuteDisease ProgressionHumansNeoplasm, ResidualOncogene Proteins, FusionRecurrenceRetrospective StudiesOncogene Proteins, Fusion

Identifiers

PMID31896684
PMCPMC7776265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.