Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31896580›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2020

Improved protein structure prediction using predicted interresidue orientations.

Jianyi Yang, Ivan Anishchenko, Hahnbeom Park, Zhenling Peng, Sergey Ovchinnikov, David Baker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 684 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
684citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

684 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Variational inference in coupled models of amino acid substitution.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Nanoscale Spatial Organization of ARC High- and Low-Order Assemblies at Excitatory Synapses.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. CLASPP: A unified model for predicting post-translational modifications.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

624 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jianyi YangSchool of Mathematical Sciences, Nankai University, 300071 Tianjin, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2912-7737
Ivan AnishchenkoDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98105.ORCID 0000-0003-3645-2044
Hahnbeom ParkDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98105.
Zhenling PengCenter for Applied Mathematics, Tianjin University, 300072 Tianjin, China.
Sergey OvchinnikovJohn Harvard Distinguished Science Fellowship Program, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138.
David BakerDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98105; dabaker@uw.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-7896-6217

Funding

High resolution structure modeling with RosettaR01GM092802 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI BAKER, DAVID · 2010 to 2017
$2.3M
Exploring the unknown protein universe using evolutionary informationDP5OD026389 · OD · HARVARD UNIVERSITY · PI OVCHINNIKOV, SERGEY L. · 2018 to 2022
$2.0M
NIAID NIH HHS HHSN272201700059CNIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM092802NIH HHS DP5 OD026389
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prediction of interresidue contacts and distances from coevolutionary data using deep learning has considerably advanced protein structure prediction. Here, we build on these advances by developing a deep residual network for predicting interresidue orientations, in addition to distances, and a Rosetta-constrained energy-minimization protocol for rapidly and accurately generating structure models guided by these restraints. In benchmark tests on 13th Community-Wide Experiment on the Critical Assessment of Techniques for Protein Structure Prediction (CASP13)- and Continuous Automated Model Evaluation (CAMEO)-derived sets, the method outperforms all previously described structure-prediction methods. Although trained entirely on native proteins, the network consistently assigns higher probability to de novo-designed proteins, identifying the key fold-determining residues and providing an independent quantitative measure of the "ideality" of a protein structure. The method promises to be useful for a broad range of protein structure prediction and design problems.

Indexed as

Protein ConformationSoftwareAnimalsDeep LearningHumansSequence Analysis, Proteindeep learningprotein contact predictionprotein structure prediction

Identifiers

PMID31896580
PMCPMC6983395

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.