Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31896285›Full record

ReviewThe neuroradiology journal2020

Review of neuroimaging findings in congenital Zika virus syndrome and its relation to the time of infection.

Graciane Radaelli, Magda Lahorgue Nunes, Ricardo Bernardi Soder, Júlia Monteiro de Oliveira, Fernanda Thays Konat Bruzzo, Felipe Kalil Neto, Eduardo Leal-Conceição, Mirna Wetters Portuguez, Jaderson Costa da Costa

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The neuroradiology journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Graciane RadaelliBrain Institute of Rio Grande do Sul (BraIns), Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1208-362X
Magda Lahorgue NunesBrain Institute of Rio Grande do Sul (BraIns), Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Ricardo Bernardi SoderBrain Institute of Rio Grande do Sul (BraIns), Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Júlia Monteiro de OliveiraBrain Institute of Rio Grande do Sul (BraIns), Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Fernanda Thays Konat BruzzoBrain Institute of Rio Grande do Sul (BraIns), Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Felipe Kalil NetoBrain Institute of Rio Grande do Sul (BraIns), Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Eduardo Leal-ConceiçãoBrain Institute of Rio Grande do Sul (BraIns), Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Mirna Wetters PortuguezBrain Institute of Rio Grande do Sul (BraIns), Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Jaderson Costa da CostaBrain Institute of Rio Grande do Sul (BraIns), Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6776-1515
Instituto do Cérebro · BRNational Council for Scientific and Technological Development · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany original articles and case series have been published emphasizing the neuroimaging findings of congenital Zika virus (ZIKV) infection. The majority of these studies do not follow a neuroradiological methodology to describe malformations and brain abnormalities resulting from ZIKV infection. The cause-and-effect correlation between the gestational period of maternal infection and the severity of encephalic changes at birth has rarely been reported. A systematic literature review was conducted on the neuroimaging findings in children affected with microcephaly due to ZIKV.

methodsPubMed, Cochrane Library and Web of Science were searched for full-text articles published up to July 2019. Duplicate entries were removed. Two independent reviewers performed a quality assessment of all the studies included.

resultsA total of 2214 publications were identified. Of these 2170 were excluded by analysis of titles and abstracts, resulting in the inclusion of only eight articles. Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests were performed with a 95% confidence interval to verify the statistically significant differences in the neuroradiological findings between the cases of ZIKV infection in the first or second trimester of gestation. The studies published so far have described image abnormalities at random, without utilizing any pre-established neuroradiological criteria, and imaging modalities with different sensitivity and accuracy have been used, which jeopardizes a reliable and adequate statistical analysis.

conclusionsNeuroimaging abnormalities are much more prevalent and severe when the infection by ZIKV is contracted in the first or second trimester of pregnancy.

Indexed as

BrainHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMicrocephalyNeuroimagingTomography, X-Ray ComputedUltrasonography, PrenatalZika Virus Infectionmagnetic resonancemicrocephalytomographyZika virus

Identifiers

PMID31896285
PMCPMC7140307
OpenAlexW2998589488

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.