Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31896119›Full record

ReviewNeuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology2020

"Chasing the first high": memory sampling in drug choice.

Aaron M Bornstein, Hanna Pickard

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Drawbacks to Strengthening Neural Salience Encoding: A Link Between Cortisol and Risky Drinking.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Back to the future: Progressing memory research in eating disorders.The International journal of eating disorders · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Advances in modeling learning and decision-making in neuroscience.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Aaron M Bornstein *Department of Cognitive Sciences, University of California, Irvine, CA, 92617, USA. aaron.bornstein@uci.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6251-6000
Hanna Pickard *Department of Philosophy, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21218, USA. h.pickard@jhu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5926-1377

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although vivid memories of drug experiences are prevalent within clinical contexts and addiction folklore ("chasing the first high"), little is known about the relevance of cognitive processes governing memory retrieval to substance use disorder. Drawing on recent work that identifies episodic memory's influence on decisions for reward, we propose a framework in which drug choices are biased by selective sampling of individual memories during two phases of addiction: (i) downward spiral into persistent use and (ii) relapse. Consideration of how memory retrieval influences the addiction process suggests novel treatment strategies. Rather than try to break learned associations between drug cues and drug rewards, treatment should aim to strengthen existing and/or create new associations between drug cues and drug-inconsistent rewards.

Indexed as

Memory, EpisodicPharmaceutical PreparationsCuesLearningMemoryMental RecallPharmaceutical Preparations

Identifiers

PMID31896119
PMCPMC7162911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.