Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31896090›Full record

ArticleNeurosurgical focus2020

Evaluating infusate parameters for direct drug delivery to the brainstem: a comparative study of convection-enhanced delivery versus osmotic pump delivery.

Julian S Rechberger, Erica A Power, Victor M Lu, Liang Zhang, Jann N Sarkaria, David J Daniels

Open access · diamondAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Neurosurgical focus, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Julian S Rechberger1Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic.
Erica A Power1Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic.
Victor M Lu1Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic.
Liang Zhang1Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic.
Jann N Sarkaria3Department of Radiation Oncology; and.
David J Daniels1Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic.
WinnMed · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · US

Funding

Mayo Clinic Center for Clinical and Translational Science (CCaTS UL1 Supplement - Dr. Timothy Curry)UL1TR002377 · NCATS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI VESNA D GAROVIC · 2017 to 2026
$78.4M
Trans Network ProjectU54CA210180 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI SARKARIA, JANN N. · 2016 to 2020
$10.2M
NRSA Training CoreTL1TR002380 · NCATS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Felicity T. B. Enders, ANTHONY John WINDEBANK · 2017 to 2026
$6.0M
Uncovering Therapeutic Targets in Pediatric High Grade Gliomas with the H3K27M MutationK08NS092891 · NINDS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI DANIELS, DAVID · 2017 to 2021
$908k
NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR002380NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002377NCI NIH HHS U54 CA210180NINDS NIH HHS K08 NS092891
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveConvection-enhanced delivery (CED) and osmotic pump delivery both have been promoted as promising techniques to deliver drugs to pediatric diffuse intrinsic pontine gliomas (DIPGs). Correspondingly, the aim of this study was to understand how infusate molecular weight (MW), duration of delivery, and mechanism of delivery (CED or osmotic pump) affect volume of distribution (Vd) in the brainstem, to better inform drug selection and delivery in future DIPG investigations.

methodsA series of in vivo experiments were conducted using rat models. CED and osmotic pump delivery systems were surgically implanted in the brainstem, and different MW fluorescent dextran beads were infused either once (acute) or daily for 5 days (chronic) in a volume infused (Vi). Brainstems were harvested after the last infusion, and Vd was quantified using serial sectioning and fluorescence imaging.

resultsFluorescence imaging showed infusate uptake within the brainstem for both systems without complication. A significant inverse relationship was observed between infusate MW and Vd in all settings, which was distinctly exponential in nature in the setting of acute delivery across the 570-Da to 150-kDa range. Chronic duration and CED technique resulted in significantly greater Vd compared to acute duration or osmotic pump delivery, respectively. When accounting for Vi, acute infusion yielded significantly greater Vd/Vi than chronic infusion. The distribution in CED versus osmotic pump delivery was significantly affected by infusate MW at higher weights.

conclusionsHere the authors demonstrate that infusate MW, duration of infusion, and infusion mechanism all impact the Vd of an infused agent and should be considered when selecting drugs and infusion parameters for novel investigations to treat DIPGs.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrain StemBrain Stem NeoplasmsConvectionDisease Models, AnimalDrug Delivery SystemsGliomaMagnetic Resonance ImagingRats, Sprague-DawleyBBB = blood-brain barrierBLI = bioluminescence imagingbrainstemCEDCED = convection-enhanced deliveryconvection-enhanced deliverydiffuse intrinsic pontine gliomaDIPGDIPG = diffuse intrinsic pontine gliomaFITC = fluorescein isothiocyanatemolecular weightMW = molecular weightosmotic pumpPDX = patient-derived xenograftVd = volume of distributionVi = volume infusedvolume of distribution

Identifiers

PMID31896090
PMCPMC7371267
OpenAlexW2996799416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.