Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31895925›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Efficient estimation of stereo thresholds: What slope should be assumed for the psychometric function?

Ignacio Serrano-Pedraza, Kathleen Vancleef, William Herbert, Nicola Goodship, Maeve Woodhouse, Jenny C A Read

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Spatiotemporal Characteristics of the Stereoscopic Anisotropy.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. The Stereoscopic Anisotropy Is Smaller in Elderly Population.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2022
    Article
  5. ASTEROID stereotest v1.0: lower stereo thresholds using smaller, denser and faster dots.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ignacio Serrano-PedrazaFaculty of Psychology, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4464-1905
Kathleen VancleefCognitive Neuropsychology Centre, Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
William HerbertInstitute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Nicola GoodshipInstitute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Maeve WoodhouseInstitute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Jenny C A ReadInstitute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.

Funding

Department of Health HICF-R8-442Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust WT102565
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bayesian staircases are widely used in psychophysics to estimate detection thresholds. Simulations have revealed the importance of the parameters selected for the assumed subject's psychometric function in enabling thresholds to be estimated with small bias and high precision. One important parameter is the slope of the psychometric function, or equivalently its spread. This is often held fixed, rather than estimated for individual subjects, because much larger numbers of trials are required to estimate the spread as well as the threshold. However, if this fixed value is wrong, the threshold estimate can be biased. Here we determine the optimal slope to minimize bias and maximize precision when measuring stereoacuity with Bayesian staircases. We performed 2- and 4AFC disparity detection stereo experiments in order to measure the spread of the disparity psychometric function in human observers assuming a Logistic function. We found a wide range, between 0.03 and 3.5 log10 arcsec, with little change with age. We then ran simulations to examine the optimal spread using the empirical data. From our simulations and for three different experiments, we recommend selecting assumed spread values between the percentiles 60-80% of the population distribution of spreads (these percentiles can be extended to other type of thresholds). For stereo thresholds, we recommend a spread around the value σ = 1.7 log10 arcsec for 2AFC (slope β = 4.3 /log10 arcsec), and around σ = 1.5 log10 arcsec for 4AFC (β = 4.9 /log10 arcsec). Finally, we compared a Bayesian procedure (ZEST using the optimal σ) with five Bayesian procedures that are versions of ZEST-2D, Psi, and Psi-marginal. In general, for the conditions tested, ZEST optimal σ showed the lowest threshold bias and highest precision.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultBayes TheoremChildChild, PreschoolEmpirical ResearchFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPsychoacousticsPsychometricsSensory ThresholdsVisual PerceptionYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID31895925
PMCPMC6939937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.