ArticleMedicine2020
Development of a CT imaging phantom of anthromorphic lung using fused deposition modeling 3D printing.
Article in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- A review on radiological properties of fused deposition modelling material for three-dimensional printing in proton and light ion beam therapy.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2026Review
- Processing and Modeling of Alginate Hydrogel for Radiologically-Equivalent Biomedical Phantoms.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Development and Radiological Evaluation of 3D-Printed Patient-Specific Lung Phantoms: From CT Imaging to 3D Modeling and Material Characterization.Research square · 2026Article
- Part-solid pulmonary nodule phantoms with realistic morphology and densities by stereolithography-based 3D-printing: from design to validation.European radiology experimental · 2025Article
- Osteoporosis management-current and future perspectives - A systemic review.Journal of orthopaedics · 2024Review
- Development of a patient-specific chest computed tomography imaging phantom with realistic lung lesions using silicone casting and three-dimensional printing.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Low-Cost Pseudo-Anthropomorphic PVA-C and Cellulose Lung Phantom for Ultrasound-Guided Interventions.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- A customized anthropomorphic 3D-printed phantom to reproducibility assessment in computed tomography: an oncological case study.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- 3D printed anthropomorphic left ventricular myocardial phantom for nuclear medicine imaging applications.EJNMMI physics · 2022Article
- Technical note: Controlling the attenuation of 3D-printed physical phantoms for computed tomography with a single material.Medical physics · 2022Article
- Clinical acceptance of advanced visualization methods: a comparison study of 3D-print, virtual reality glasses, and 3D-display.3D printing in medicine · 2022Article
- 3D Printing of Physical Organ Models: Recent Developments and Challenges.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2021Review
- Application of 3D modeling and fusion technology of medical image data in image teaching.BMC medical education · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Development of patient-specific CT imaging phantoms with randomly incorporated lesions of various shapes and sizes for calibrating image intensity and validating quantitative measurement software is very challenging. In this investigation, a physical phantom that accurately represents a patient's specific anatomy and the intensity of lung CT images at the voxel level will be fabricated using fused deposition modeling (FDM) 3D printing. Segmentation and modeling of a patient's CT data were performed by an expert and the results were confirmed by a thoracic radiologist with more than 20 years of experience. This facilitated the extraction of the details of the patient's anatomy; various kinds of nodules with different shapes and sizes were randomly added to the modeled lung for evaluating the size-accuracy of the quantification software. To achieve these Hounsfield Units (HU) ranges for the corresponding voxels in acquired CT scans, the infill ratios of FDM 3D printing were controlled. Based on CT scans of the 3D printed phantoms, the measured HU for normal pulmonary parenchyma, ground glass opacity (GGO), and solid nodules were determined to be within target HU ranges. The accuracy of the mean absolute difference and the mean relative difference of nodules were less than 0.55 ± 0.30 mm and 3.72 ± 1.64% (mean difference ± 95 CI), respectively. Patient-specific CT imaging phantoms were designed and manufactured using an FDM printer, which could be applied for the precise calibration of CT intensity and the validation of image quantification software.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.