Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31895781›Full record

Observational studyMedicine2020

Relationship between the prevalence of polycythemia and factors observed in the mental health and lifestyle survey after the Great East Japan Earthquake.

Akira Sakai, Hironori Nakano, Tetsuya Ohira, Masaharu Maeda, Kanako Okazaki, Atsushi Takahashi, Yukihiko Kawasaki, Hiroaki Satoh, Akira Ohtsuru, Michio Shimabukuro and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Akira SakaiDepartment of Radiation Life Sciences.
Hironori NakanoRadiation Medical Science Center for the Fukushima Health Management Survey.
Tetsuya OhiraRadiation Medical Science Center for the Fukushima Health Management Survey.
Masaharu MaedaRadiation Medical Science Center for the Fukushima Health Management Survey.
Kanako OkazakiRadiation Medical Science Center for the Fukushima Health Management Survey.
Atsushi TakahashiRadiation Medical Science Center for the Fukushima Health Management Survey.
Yukihiko KawasakiRadiation Medical Science Center for the Fukushima Health Management Survey.
Hiroaki SatohRadiation Medical Science Center for the Fukushima Health Management Survey.
Akira OhtsuruRadiation Medical Science Center for the Fukushima Health Management Survey.
Michio ShimabukuroRadiation Medical Science Center for the Fukushima Health Management Survey.
Junichiro KazamaRadiation Medical Science Center for the Fukushima Health Management Survey.
Shigeatsu HashimotoRadiation Medical Science Center for the Fukushima Health Management Survey.
Mitsuaki HosoyaRadiation Medical Science Center for the Fukushima Health Management Survey.
Seiji YasumuraRadiation Medical Science Center for the Fukushima Health Management Survey.
Hirooki YabeRadiation Medical Science Center for the Fukushima Health Management Survey.
Hitoshi OhtoRadiation Medical Science Center for the Fukushima Health Management Survey.
Kenji KamiyaRadiation Medical Science Center for the Fukushima Health Management Survey.
Fukushima Health Management Survey Group
Fukushima Medical University · JPDiabetes Australia · AUJuntendo University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have been examining the Comprehensive Health Check of the Fukushima Health Management Survey of residents of 13 municipalities who were forced by the government to evacuate due to the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake (GEJE). Our findings showed that evacuation is a risk factor for polycythemia and suggested that experiencing an unprecedented disaster and exposure to chronic stress due to evacuation might be a cause of polycythemia.We analyzed the relationship between the prevalence of polycythemia and the following factors observed in the Mental Health and Lifestyle Survey in an observational study with a cross-sectional design: traumatic symptoms, depression status, socioeconomic factors such as residential environment, and working situation after the GEJE. Target population of the survey included men and women who were at least 15 years of age and who lived in the evacuation zones specified by the government. Participants analyzed consisted of 29,474 persons (12,379 men and 16,888 women) who had participated in both the 2011 Comprehensive Health Check and Mental Health and Lifestyle Survey from June 2011 through March 2012.The prevalence of polycythemia was not associated with mental states associated with traumatic symptoms (Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Checklist Scale ≥ 44) and depression status (Kessler 6-item Scale ≥ 13). Furthermore, multivariate analysis showed that there was a tendency for males to develop polycythemia, with characteristics such as being aged 65 years and older, highly educated, obese (body mass index ≥ 25), hypertensive, diabetic, having liver dysfunction, and a smoker being significantly related to the prevalence of polycythemia.Our findings conclusively demonstrated that polycythemia was not significantly related to psychological factors, but was significantly related to the onset of lifestyle-related disease after the GEJE.

Indexed as

Fukushima Nuclear AccidentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCausalityComorbidityEarthquakesFemaleHumansJapanLife StyleMaleMiddle AgedPolycythemiaPrevalenceTsunamis

Identifiers

PMID31895781
PMCPMC6946557
OpenAlexW2997712705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.