Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31895673›Full record

ArticlePreventing chronic disease2020

A Bivariate Mapping Tutorial for Cancer Control Resource Allocation Decisions and Interventions.

Claire Biesecker, Whitney E Zahnd, Heather M Brandt, Swann Arp Adams, Jan M Eberth

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Preventing chronic disease, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Claire BieseckerRural and Minority Health Research Center, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina.
Whitney E ZahndRural and Minority Health Research Center, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, 220 Stoneridge Dr, Ste 204, Columbia, SC 29210. Email: zahnd@mailbox.sc.edu.
Heather M BrandtRural and Minority Health Research Center, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina.
Swann Arp AdamsRural and Minority Health Research Center, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina.
Jan M EberthRural and Minority Health Research Center, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bivariate choropleth mapping is a straightforward but underused method for displaying geographic health information to use in public health decision making. Previous studies have recommended this approach for state comprehensive cancer control planning and similar efforts. In this method, 2 area-level variables of interest are mapped simultaneously, often as overlapping quantiles or by using other classification methods. Variables to be mapped may include area-level (eg, county level) measures of disease burden, health care use, access to health care services, and sociodemographic characteristics. We demonstrate how geographic information systems software, specifically ArcGIS, can be used to develop bivariate choropleth maps to inform resource allocation and public health interventions. We used 2 types of county-level public health data: South Carolina's Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System estimates of ever having received cervical cancer screening, and a measure of availability of cervical cancer screening providers that are part of South Carolina's Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program. Identification of counties with low screening rates and low access to care may help inform where additional resources should be allocated to improve access and subsequently improve screening rates. Similarly, identifying counties with low screening rates and high access to care may help inform where educational and behavioral interventions should be targeted to improve screening in areas of high access.

Indexed as

Geographic Information SystemsGeographic MappingBehavioral Risk Factor Surveillance SystemHumansNeoplasmsPopulation SurveillancePublic HealthResource Allocation

Identifiers

PMID31895673
PMCPMC6977777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.