Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31895608›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2020

Patient-Reported Functional Outcomes After Hypofractionated or Conventionally Fractionated Radiation for Prostate Cancer: A National Cohort Study in England.

Julie Nossiter, Arunan Sujenthiran, Thomas E Cowling, Matthew G Parry, Susan C Charman, Paul Cathcart, Noel W Clarke, Heather Payne, Jan van der Meulen, Ajay Aggarwal

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Julie NossiterDepartment of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Arunan SujenthiranClinical Effectiveness Unit, The Royal College of Surgeons of England, London, United Kingdom.
Thomas E CowlingDepartment of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Matthew G ParryClinical Effectiveness Unit, The Royal College of Surgeons of England, London, United Kingdom.
Susan C CharmanDepartment of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Paul CathcartDepartment of Urology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Noel W ClarkeDepartment of Urology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Heather PayneDepartment of Oncology, University College London Hospitals, London, United Kingdom.
Jan van der MeulenDepartment of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Ajay AggarwalDepartment of Cancer Epidemiology, Population, and Global Health, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBRoyal College of Surgeons of England · GBGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust · GBKing's College London · GBRoyal London Hospital · GBSalford Royal NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

Department of Health DRF-2018-11-ST2-036Medical Research Council MR/S020470/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of the current study was to determine patient-reported functional outcomes in men with prostate cancer (PCa) undergoing moderately hypofractionated (H-RT) or conventionally fractionated radiation therapy (C-RT) in a national cohort study. PATIENDS AND

methodsAll men diagnosed with PCa between April 2014 and September 2016 in the English National Health Service undergoing C-RT or H-RT were identified in the National Prostate Cancer Audit and mailed a questionnaire at least 18 months after diagnosis. We estimated differences in patient-reported urinary, bowel, sexual, and hormonal function-Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite short-form 26 domain scores on a 0 to 100 scale-and health-related quality of life-EQ-5D-5L on a 0 to 1 scale-using linear regression with adjustment for patient, tumor, and treatment-related factors in addition to GI and genitourinary baseline function, with higher scores representing better outcomes.

resultsOf the 17,058 men in the cohort, 77% responded: 8,432 men received C-RT (64.2%) and 4,699 H-RT (35.8%). Men in the H-RT group were older (age ≥ 70 years: 67.5%

conclusionThis is the first national cohort study comparing functional outcomes after H-RT and C-RT reported by patients. These real-world results further support the use of H-RT as the standard for radiation therapy in men with nonmetastatic PCa.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesDose Fractionation, RadiationEnglandHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresProstatic NeoplasmsQuality of LifeSurveys and QuestionnairesTreatment OutcomeWales

Identifiers

PMID31895608
PMCPMC7048158
OpenAlexW2998041096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.