ArticleJAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery2020
Evaluation of Safety of Intralesional Cidofovir for Adjuvant Treatment of Recurrent Respiratory Papillomatosis.
Article in JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Intralesional cidofovir vs. bevacizumab for recurrent respiratory papillomatosis: a systematic review and indirect meta-analysis.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2024Pooled it
- Recurrent Respiratory Papillomatosis Foundation Position Statement on the Management of Adults With RRP.The Laryngoscope · 2026Article
- Laryngeal Papillomatosis.Cancers · 2025Review
- Global trends and hotspots on recurrent respiratory papillomatosis: A 20-year bibliometric analysis.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2024Article
- Clinical evaluation of pediatric patients with recurrent respiratory papillomatosis.: A longitudinal study at a Saudi Arabian tertiary care center.Saudi medical journal · 2024Article
- How Enhancing Immunity to Low-Risk HPV Could Cure Recurrent Respiratory Papillomatosis.The Laryngoscope · 2021Review
- Intralesional cidofovir for the management of refractory cutaneous verrucae: a review of applications and opportunities.Therapeutic advances in infectious diseaseReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: The use of intralesional cidofovir injections for recurrent respiratory papillomatosis (RRP) remains controversial owing to concern regarding the risks of its use, including increased risk of dysplasia or carcinogenesis. Objective: To describe the rates of dysplasia, development of malignant lesions, and adverse events associated with use of intralesional cidofovir injections as adjuvant treatment for RRP compared with patients treated without adjuvant cidofovir. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this case series performed at a tertiary care referral center, review of electronic medical records on all adult and pediatric patients (N = 154) treated for RRP with adequate follow-up from January 1, 2000, to December 31, 2016, was performed. Data were collected on the use of cidofovir, development and presence of dysplasia or malignant lesions, complications, and intersurgical interval. Exposures: Adjuvant intralesional cidofovir or surgical excision only. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcomes measured were the development of dysplasia, malignant lesions, and complications from treatment. These outcomes were determined before collection of data. Results: Of the 154 patients included in the analysis, 83 patients (53.9%) received adjuvant intralesional cidofovir and 71 patients (46.1%) underwent surgical excision only. One hundred patients (64.9%) were male; mean age was 27.7 (95% CI, 24.3-31.2) years. Patients were followed up for a median (interquartile range) of 70 (24-118) months in the noncidofovir group and 91 (47-152) months in the cidofovir group. There were no statistically significant differences in the rates of development of dysplasia (2.8%; 95% CI, -8.3% to 13.2%) or malignant lesions (2.2%; 95% CI, -5.3% to 11.2%) between the groups. No nephrotoxic effects were observed in the treated cohort, and only 5 minor complications that occurred in 628 injections were noted in the cidofovir group; 3 were related to direct laryngoscopy and 2 were related to needle malfunction. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort of patients with RRP, adjuvant intralesional cidofovir injections did not appear to cause major complications or an increased rate of development of dysplasia and cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.