Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31895450›Full record

ArticleJAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery2020

Evaluation of Safety of Intralesional Cidofovir for Adjuvant Treatment of Recurrent Respiratory Papillomatosis.

Rebecca C Hoesli, Aaron L Thatcher, Norman D Hogikyan, Robbi A Kupfer

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Intralesional cidofovir vs. bevacizumab for recurrent respiratory papillomatosis: a systematic review and indirect meta-analysis.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rebecca C HoesliBastian Voice Institute, Downers Grove, Illinois.
Aaron L ThatcherDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Norman D HogikyanDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Robbi A KupferDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USBastian Voice Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: The use of intralesional cidofovir injections for recurrent respiratory papillomatosis (RRP) remains controversial owing to concern regarding the risks of its use, including increased risk of dysplasia or carcinogenesis. Objective: To describe the rates of dysplasia, development of malignant lesions, and adverse events associated with use of intralesional cidofovir injections as adjuvant treatment for RRP compared with patients treated without adjuvant cidofovir. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this case series performed at a tertiary care referral center, review of electronic medical records on all adult and pediatric patients (N = 154) treated for RRP with adequate follow-up from January 1, 2000, to December 31, 2016, was performed. Data were collected on the use of cidofovir, development and presence of dysplasia or malignant lesions, complications, and intersurgical interval. Exposures: Adjuvant intralesional cidofovir or surgical excision only. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcomes measured were the development of dysplasia, malignant lesions, and complications from treatment. These outcomes were determined before collection of data. Results: Of the 154 patients included in the analysis, 83 patients (53.9%) received adjuvant intralesional cidofovir and 71 patients (46.1%) underwent surgical excision only. One hundred patients (64.9%) were male; mean age was 27.7 (95% CI, 24.3-31.2) years. Patients were followed up for a median (interquartile range) of 70 (24-118) months in the noncidofovir group and 91 (47-152) months in the cidofovir group. There were no statistically significant differences in the rates of development of dysplasia (2.8%; 95% CI, -8.3% to 13.2%) or malignant lesions (2.2%; 95% CI, -5.3% to 11.2%) between the groups. No nephrotoxic effects were observed in the treated cohort, and only 5 minor complications that occurred in 628 injections were noted in the cidofovir group; 3 were related to direct laryngoscopy and 2 were related to needle malfunction. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort of patients with RRP, adjuvant intralesional cidofovir injections did not appear to cause major complications or an increased rate of development of dysplasia and cancer.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAntiviral AgentsChemotherapy, AdjuvantChildChild, PreschoolCidofovirFemaleHumansInjections, IntralesionalLaryngeal NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedPapillomavirus InfectionsRespiratory Tract InfectionsRetrospective StudiesAntiviral AgentsCidofovir

Identifiers

PMID31895450
PMCPMC7018395
OpenAlexW2998680606

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.