ReviewCurrent opinion in HIV and AIDS2020
What lessons it might teach us? Community engagement in HIV research.
Review in Current opinion in HIV and AIDS, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed.
- Barriers and Facilitators to Equitable Implementation of Long-Acting Injectable PrEP for Racial, Gender and Sexual Minority Populations in NYC: The EquiPrEP Study.AIDS and behavior · 2026Article
- Envisioning a Multidisciplinary HBV Cure Research Agenda.Current HIV/AIDS reports · 2025Review
- Integrating socio-behavioral, ethics, community, and translational science considerations in HIV cure research.Current opinion in HIV and AIDS · 2025Review
- Implementing Social Media Strategies in Community-Partnered HIV Research: Practical Considerations From 3 Ongoing Studies.JMIR public health and surveillance · 2025Article
- How community members in Uganda perceive controlled human infection studies.Research ethics · 2025Article
- The Hallmarks of Ageing in Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection and the Impact of Antiretroviral Therapy on Telomeres: A Molecular Perspective.Current issues in molecular biology · 2025Review
- A Multicomponent Strategy to Improve HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis in a Southern US Jail: Protocol for a Type 3 Hybrid Implementation-Effectiveness Trial.JMIR research protocols · 2025Article
- St. Louis enhancing engagement and retention (STEER) in HIV/AIDS care: a participatory intersectional needs assessment for intervention and implementation planning.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Community engagement to mitigate antimicrobial resistance in low-and middle-income countries - an essential strategy for implementation of national action plans on AMR.The Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia · 2024Article
- Formulating a Community-Centric Indicator Framework to Quantify One Health Drivers of Antibiotic Resistance: A Preliminary Step towards Fostering 'Antibiotic-Smart Communities'.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- External relationships as implementation determinants in community-engaged, equity-focused COVID-19 vaccination events.Frontiers in health services · 2024Article
- Opportunities and challenges to implementing mRNA-based vaccines and medicines: lessons from COVID-19.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- HIV Prevention and Care Among Black Cisgender Sexual Minority Men and Transgender Women: Protocol for an HIV Status-Neutral Cohort Study Using an Observational-Implementation Hybrid Approach.JMIR research protocols · 2023Article
- Participant experiences in HIV cure-directed trial with an extended analytical treatment interruption in Philadelphia, United States.HIV research & clinical practice · 2023Article
- Increasing the meaningful involvement of women in HIV cure-related research: a qualitative interview study in the United States.HIV research & clinical practice · 2023Article
- Community engagement group model in basic and biomedical research: lessons learned from the BEAT-HIV Delaney Collaboratory towards an HIV-1 cure.Research involvement and engagement · 2023Article
- Intervening on the Intersecting Issues of Intimate Partner Violence, Substance Use, and HIV: A Review of Social Intervention Group's (SIG) Syndemic-Focused Interventions for Women.Research on social work practice · 2023Article
- Article
- Using Community-Based Participatory Research to Develop Care Recommendations for People Aging With HIV.Innovation in aging · 2023Article
- Addressing coloniality of power to improve HIV care in South Africa and other LMIC.Frontiers in reproductive health · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purpose of reviewPartnerships between academia and the community led to historic advances in HIV and paved the way for ongoing community engagement in research. Three decades later, we review the state of community engagement in HIV research, discuss best practices as supported by literature, explore innovations, and identify ongoing gaps in knowledge. RECENT
findingsThe community of people living with and at risk for HIV remains actively involved in the performance of HIV research. However, the extent of participation is highly variable despite long standing and established principles and guidelines of good participatory practices (GPP) and community-based participatory research (CBPR). Current literature reveals that known barriers to successful community engagement continue to exist such as power differences, and poor scientific or cultural competency literacy. Several high-quality studies share their experiences overcoming these barriers and demonstrate the potential of CBPR through reporting of qualitative and quantitative outcomes. SUMMARY: Greater time and attention should be placed on the development of community engagement in HIV research. A large body of literature, including innovative cross-cutting approaches, exists to guide and inform best practices and mitigate common barriers. However, we recognize that true growth and expansion of CBPR within HIV and in other fields will require a greater breadth of research reporting qualitative and quantitative outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.