ArticleJournal of consulting and clinical psychology2020
Testing the validity and clinical utility of the severity specifiers for binge-eating disorder for predicting treatment outcomes.
Article in Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Correcting the reward imbalance in binge eating: A pilot randomized trial of reward re-training treatment.Appetite · 2022Trial
- Change in eating-disorder psychopathology network structure in patients with binge-eating disorder: Findings from treatment trial with 12-month follow-up.Journal of consulting and clinical psychology · 2022Trial
- Psychometric characteristics of DSM-5 eating disorder diagnostic criteria: support for a transdiagnostic approach.Journal of eating disorders · 2026Article
- A latent profile analysis of the functions of binge eating.Journal of eating disorders · 2025Article
- Redefining diagnostic parameters: the role of overvaluation of shape and weight in binge-eating disorder: a systematic review.Journal of eating disorders · 2025Review
- Cognitive flexibility and DSM-5 severity criteria for eating disorders: assessing drive for thinness and duration of illness as alternative severity variables.Journal of eating disorders · 2023Article
- Predictors of Treatment Outcome in Eating Disorders: A Roadmap to Inform Future Research Efforts.Current psychiatry reports · 2023Review
- Loss-of-Control Eating and Cardiometabolic Health in Relation to Overweight and Obesity.Current diabetes reports · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo test the validity and clinical utility of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th ed.;
methodParticipants (
resultsMixed models revealed that severity category did not significantly predict treatment response. However, there were main effects of BED severity category: "Severe/extreme" BED had greater binge-eating frequency and had greater global eating-disorder psychopathology than did "mild" BED across all time points. "Severe/extreme" BED was less likely to have remission from binge eating than was "mild" BED. Weight loss and depression scores did not significantly differ by severity category.
conclusionIn a large series of treatment-seeking individuals with BED aggregated across RCTs at 1 medical center testing psychological and pharmacological treatments for BED,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.