SynthesisAdvances in experimental medicine and biology2019
The Use of Social Media in Anatomical and Health Professional Education: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Are YouTube videos claiming to describe lumbar spinal manipulation techniques adequate?The Journal of manual & manipulative therapy · 2023Article
- Quality of free gingival graft content in youtube videos: Usability in patient information and student education.Medicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal · 2023Article
- Perceptions and Experiences of Undergraduate Students Regarding Social Media as a Tool for Government COVID-19-Related Messages: A Qualitative Study in Nottingham, UK.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Patient education on subacromial impingement syndrome : Reliability and educational quality of content available on Google and YouTube.Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2022Article
- What influences graduate medical students' beliefs of lower back pain? A mixed methods cross sectional study.BMC medical education · 2022Article
- The effect of Snapchat on learner satisfaction and anatomical knowledge retention: Preliminary observations.FASEB bioAdvances · 2021Article
- Exploring Information Available to and Used by Physicians on Antibiotic Use and Antibiotic Resistance in Jordan.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Experiences of Pathology Course among Hospital Management Graduates.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- A review of anatomy education during and after the COVID-19 pandemic: Revisiting traditional and modern methods to achieve future innovation.Clinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.) · 2021Review
- Crowdsourcing snake identification with online communities of professional herpetologists and avocational snake enthusiasts.Royal Society open science · 2021Article
- A perspective on retina education through social media.International journal of retina and vitreous · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Social media is used by many students at universities, with sites such as Facebook, Twitter and YouTube being the most popular. Initially these social networking sites were mainly used for recreational purposes, but they have been increasingly used in an educational setting. Educators in the anatomical sciences and health professions have utilised many forms of technology to supplement and enhance a student's learning. However, the true effectiveness of using social media in anatomical and health professions education has not been fully explored. It has been hypothesised that social media in anatomical sciences and health professional education could enhance learner engagement, raise morale, relieve anxieties and improve communication. However, the evidence is limited. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to undertake a comprehensive literature review to examine the effectiveness, or otherwise, of these tools when implemented. We used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) method for reviewing the literature. By using specific keywords and using Google Scholar, PubMed, ERIC and OVID, we performed an extensive literature search to examine the use of social media in anatomical sciences and health professional education. A total of 155 studies were identified in this systematic review, with 99 studies investigating a variety of social networking sites being included. Overall, the evidence is supportive, with 79.8% of the studies supporting the use social media in education. Furthermore, when the use of social media in the anatomical sciences and health professional was investigated, the majority of studies advocated for its implementation. Despite this, there are some factors that limit the significance of these results, and the amount of evidence was indeed limited. Additional research must be carried out if social media is to influence modern pedagogical practices, with more focus on how the intervention affects academic achievement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31894575What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.