Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31894439›Full record

ArticleCommunity mental health journal2020

Adherence to Antidepressants in Underserved Communities: A Comparison of Electronic Monitoring and Self-report Measures.

Heather F McClintock, Angela N BeKampis, Erica Hartmann, Hillary R Bogner

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Community mental health journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Heather F McClintockDepartment of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Arcadia University, 450 S. Easton Rd., Glenside, PA, 19038, USA. devriesmcclintockh@arcadia.edu.
Angela N BeKampisDepartment of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Arcadia University, 450 S. Easton Rd., Glenside, PA, 19038, USA.
Erica HartmannDepartment of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Arcadia University, 450 S. Easton Rd., Glenside, PA, 19038, USA.
Hillary R BognerCenter for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Arcadia University · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nonadherence to antidepressants is widespread and poses a significant barrier to optimal management and treatment of depression in community settings. The objective of this study was to compare self-reported and electronic monitoring of adherence to antidepressants and to examine the relationship of these measures with depressive symptoms in a medically underserved community. Adherence to antidepressants was measured in 38 primary care patients from the West Philadelphia area using self-report and electronic monitoring (Medication Event Monitoring System caps). Self-report and electronic monitoring of antidepressant adherence showed fair agreement at baseline, slight agreement at 6 weeks, and slight agreement at 12 weeks. Adherence to antidepressants as assessed by electronic monitors was significantly associated with depression remission at 12 weeks [adjusted odds ratio 18.6, 95% confidence interval (1.05, 330.56)]. Compared with electronic monitoring, self-reported adherence tended to overestimate medication adherence to antidepressants. Adherence assessed by electronic monitoring was associated with depression remission.

Indexed as

Antidepressive AgentsMedication AdherenceElectronicsHumansPhiladelphiaSelf ReportAntidepressive AgentsAntidepressantsComplianceMedication adherenceUnderserved communities

Identifiers

PMID31894439
OpenAlexW2998305302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.