Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31894430›Full record

ArticleHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery2020

Evaluation of the use of component separation in elderly patients: results of a large cohort study with 30-day follow-up.

S Docimo, A Bates, M Alteri, M Talamini, A Pryor, K Spaniolas

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Geriatric assessment and medical preoperative screening (GrAMPS) program for older hernia patients.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

S DocimoDepartment of Surgery, Division of Bariatric, Foregut, and Advanced GI surgery, Stony Brook Medicine, HST T19 R053, Stony Brook, NY, 11794-8191, USA. Salvatore.docimo@stonybrookmedicine.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-3329-5699
A BatesDepartment of Surgery, Division of Bariatric, Foregut, and Advanced GI surgery, Stony Brook Medicine, HST T19 R053, Stony Brook, NY, 11794-8191, USA.
M AlteriDepartment of Surgery, Division of Bariatric, Foregut, and Advanced GI surgery, Stony Brook Medicine, HST T19 R053, Stony Brook, NY, 11794-8191, USA.
M TalaminiDepartment of Surgery, Division of Bariatric, Foregut, and Advanced GI surgery, Stony Brook Medicine, HST T19 R053, Stony Brook, NY, 11794-8191, USA.
A PryorDepartment of Surgery, Division of Bariatric, Foregut, and Advanced GI surgery, Stony Brook Medicine, HST T19 R053, Stony Brook, NY, 11794-8191, USA.
K SpaniolasDepartment of Surgery, Division of Bariatric, Foregut, and Advanced GI surgery, Stony Brook Medicine, HST T19 R053, Stony Brook, NY, 11794-8191, USA.
Stony Brook Medicine · USStony Brook School · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe incidence of massive ventral hernias among the elderly will increase as the population ages. Advanced age is often viewed as a contraindication to elective hernia repair. A relationship between age and complications of component separation procedures for ventral hernias is not well established. This study evaluated the effect of age on the peri-operative safety of AWR.

methodsThe 2005-2013 ACS-NSQIP participant use data were reviewed to compare surgical site infection (SSI), overall morbidity, and serious morbidity in non-emergent component separation procedures among all age groups. All patients were stratified into four age quartiles and evaluated. Baseline characteristics included age, body mass index (BMI) and ASA 3 or 4 criteria. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals were reported as appropriate.

results4485 patients were identified. Majority of the cases were clean (76.8%). Patients were divided into the following quartiles based on age. The older quartile had a mean age of 72.7 ± 4.87 years. There were baseline differences in BMI and chronic comorbidity severity (measured by incidence of ASA score of 3 or 4) between the age groups, with the oldest group having lower BMI but higher rate of ASA 3 or 4 (p < 0.0001 for both). The rate of postoperative SSI was significantly different between age quartile groups (ranging from 16.3% from the youngest group to 9.4% for the oldest group, p < 0.0001). After adjusting for other baseline differences, advanced age was independently associated with lower SSI rate (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.41-0.73). There was no significant difference in overall morbidity (p = 0.277) and serious morbidity (p = 0.131) between groups.

conclusionAWR is being performed with safety across all age groups. In selected patients of advanced age, AWR can be performed with similar safety profile and low SSI rate.

Indexed as

HerniorrhaphyAbdominal MusclesAdultAgedAge FactorsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHernia, VentralHumansIncisional HerniaMaleMiddle AgedMorbidityPlastic Surgery ProceduresRetrospective StudiesSurgical Wound InfectionAbdominal wall reconstructionHernia optimizationHernia repair in elderlySurgery in the elderly

Identifiers

PMID31894430
OpenAlexW2997108632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.