Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31894403›Full record

SynthesisEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2020

The role of cervical collar in functional restoration and fusion after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion without plating on single or double levels: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Luca Ricciardi, Alba Scerrati, Alessandro Olivi, Carmelo Lucio Sturiale, Pasquale De Bonis, Nicola Montano

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Support or constraint? A comprehensive analysis of postoperative cervical bracing practices: insights from the Italian society of neurosurgery (SINch) survey and a systematic review of the literature.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Luca RicciardiIstituto di Neurochirurgia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo A. Gemelli 1, 00168, Rome, Italy. ricciardi.lu@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-5110-8386
Alba ScerratiDipartimento di Neurochirurgia, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria S. Anna, Ferrara, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8607-5323
Alessandro OliviIstituto di Neurochirurgia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo A. Gemelli 1, 00168, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4489-7564
Carmelo Lucio SturialeFondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4080-2492
Pasquale De BonisDipartimento di Neurochirurgia, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria S. Anna, Ferrara, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9879-8940
Nicola MontanoIstituto di Neurochirurgia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo A. Gemelli 1, 00168, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4965-1950

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeEven though the anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is one of the most common spinal procedures, a consensus on the real need for prescribing a cervical collar (CC) after surgery is still missing. In fact, the role of external immobilization in decreasing non-fusion rate and implants displacement has not been clarified yet.

methodsThis study was conducted according to the PRISMA statement. Six different online medical databases were screened. Papers reporting the neck disability index (NDI), cervical range of motion (RoM) and fusion rate after ACDF without plating, on single or multiple levels, for cervical spondylosis were considered for eligibility.

resultsThere were no significant differences in terms of NDI scores at 2 weeks (WMD = 4.502; 95% CI - 5.953, 14.957; p = 0.399; I

conclusionsThe use of a CC after ACDF without plating on single or double levels for cervical spondylosis seems not supported by scientific evidence. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Indexed as

Spinal FusionSpondylosisCervical VertebraeDiskectomyHumansTreatment OutcomeACDFCervical spineCervical spondylosisCollarFunctional outcome

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.