ArticlePediatric cardiology2020
Right Ventricular Outflow Tract Reintervention in the Transcatheter Era: Outcomes and Cost Analysis.
Article in Pediatric cardiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Surgical pulmonary valve insertion (SPVI) for re-entry right ventricular outflow tract intervention (RVOTI) remains an established and reproducible approach. Fast-track in patients undergoing RVOTI of the comprehensive valve program targets early ICU and hospital discharge (Hd). Feasibility study for outcome and cost analysis was undertaken. Between January 2015 and December 2016, 34 patients underwent re-entry RVOTI. Seventeen had SPVI and 17 transcatheter PVI (TPVI). Surgical perioperative fast-track protocol was used. Echocardiographic evaluation preoperatively (TTE-1), after RVOTI (TTE-2), at hospital discharge (TTE-3), and follow-up (TTE-4) were obtained. Cost Analysis included procedural and hospital costs. Mean follow-up period was 11.3 ± 6.9 months. All patients were extubated prior to ICU arrival. Mean age was 8.5 ± 7.8 for SPVI [vs 28.5 ± 8.6 years for TPVI] (p < 0.05). There was no hospital mortality or 30-day readmission for SPVI (versus 1 for TPVI).Mean hospital length of stay (LOS) was 4.1 ± 1.1 days for SPVI [vs 1.1 ± 0.7 days for TPVI] (p < 0.05). Number of prior sternal re-entry had no influence on outcome. RV systolic pressure referenced to LVSP (rRVSP, %) and diastolic dimension (RVEDDi, z score) showed sustainable improvement (TTE-2, TTE-3, TTE-4) in both groups compared to TTE-1 (p < 0.05). Mean total hospital cost was $5475.86 ± 2503.91 lower after SPVI (p = 0.09), 21.7% procedural cost reduction. Patients undergoing RVOTI can be safely stratified, based on a customized concept, towards SPVI or TPVI. Standardized strategy can advocate a fast-track path. SPVI is associated with comparable mid-term outcomes to TPVI although SPVI is delivered in younger patients. Despite longer LOS SPVI is associated with reduced hospital cost. Multisite studies might help determine suitability for each strategy on cost containment/quality of life basis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.