Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31894126›Full record

ArticleJournal of biosciences2019

Investigation of axonal regeneration of

Secil Karahisar Turan, Mehmet Ali Onur, Fatma Duygu Ozel Demiralp

Abstract read
PubMed
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biosciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Secil Karahisar TuranDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Science, Hacettepe University, 06800 Ankara, Turkey.
Mehmet Ali Onur
Fatma Duygu Ozel Demiralp

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peripheral nerve injuries are frequently observed and successful treatment depends mainly on the injury type, location of the damage, and the elapsed time prior to treatment. The regenerative capacity is limited only to the embryonic period in many mammalian tissues, but urodele amphibians do not lose this feature during adulthood. The main purpose of this study is to define the recovery period after serious sciatic nerve damage of a urodele amphibian, Triturus ivanbureschi. Experimental transection damage was performed on the sciatic nerves of

Indexed as

ProteomicsAnimalsAxonsGene Expression RegulationNerve EndingsNerve RegenerationNeuritesSciatic NerveTriturus

Identifiers

PMID31894126

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.