Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31894113›Full record

ReviewJournal of biosciences2019

Overcoming randomness does not rule out the importance of inherent randomness for functionality.

Yaron Ilan

Abstract readReview
PubMed
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of biosciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Yaron IlanDepartment of Medicine, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel, ilan@hadassah.org.il.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Randomness is intrinsic to many natural processes. It is also clear that, under certain conditions, disorders are not associated with functionality. Several examples in which overcoming, suppressing, or combining both randomness and non-randomness is required are drawn from various fields. However, the need to suppress or overcome randomness does not negate its importance under certain conditions and its significance in valid processes and organ functions. Randomness should be acknowledged rather than ignored or suppressed; it can be viewed, at worst, as a disturbing disorder that may be treated to produce order, or, at best, as a 'beneficial disorder' that can be considered as a higher level of functionality.

Indexed as

Physical PhenomenaQuantum TheorySystems BiologyHumans

Identifiers

PMID31894113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.