Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31893971›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology2020

A distributional and theoretical analysis of reaction time in the reversal task across adulthood.

Kaitlynne N Leclaire, David C Osmon, Ira Driscoll

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kaitlynne N LeclaireDepartment of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7888-5772
David C OsmonDepartment of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Ira DriscollDepartment of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI, USA.

Funding

The aging brain: Imaging genetics of brain structure and functionR00AG032361 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE · PI FRAHMAND, IRA · 2011 to 2013
$719k
NIA NIH HHS R00 AG032361
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reversal learning assesses components of executive function important for understanding cognitive changes with age. Extant reversal learning literature has largely assessed measures of accuracy, but reaction time (RT) has not yet been well characterized, perhaps due to the daunting task of analyzing non-normal RT distributions. The current study contributes to the literature by examining distributional and theoretical aspects of the entire RT distribution in addition to accuracy. Participant sample included young (N = 43) and community-dwelling, healthy, middle-aged (N = 139) adults. Results showed a Normal-3 Mixture distribution best fits the sample as a whole, with the ex-Gaussian distribution passing visual inspection. Age related significantly to various measures of RT (p's < 0.5); older age was associated with higher both efficient and overall RT, perhaps due to a more conservative criterion of decision-making. In a generalized adaptive elastic net regression, RT explained age-related differences in performance while accuracy did not contribute. Specifically, middle-aged adults were slower in efficient RT and had increased intra-individual variability which has been previously linked to poorer frontal lobe processes and age-related cognitive decline. Overall, these findings highlight the importance of examining the entire RT distribution and measuring RT as a fractionated construct to further explain age-related differences in reversal learning, even in middle-aged individuals.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgingCognitive DysfunctionDecision MakingFemaleFrontal LobeHumansIndependent LivingIndividualityMaleMiddle AgedNeuropsychological TestsNormal DistributionPhotic StimulationReaction TimeDiffusion modelnon-GaussianNormal agingreaction timereversal learning

Identifiers

PMID31893971
PMCPMC8638535

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.