Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31893306›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2020

Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Polish version of the Spine Functional Index.

Agnieszka Bejer, Mateusz Kupczyk, Joanna Kwaśny, Angelika Majkut, Krzysztof Moskal, Mateusz Niemiec, Charles Philip Gabel

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 85% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Agnieszka BejerInstitute of Health Sciences, Medical College, Rzeszow University, ul. Warzywna 1A, 35-310, Rzeszow, Poland. agnbej@wp.pl.ORCID 0000-0002-5305-6548
Mateusz KupczykInstitute of Health Sciences, Medical College, Rzeszow University, ul. Warzywna 1A, 35-310, Rzeszow, Poland.
Joanna KwaśnyInstitute of Health Sciences, Medical College, Rzeszow University, ul. Warzywna 1A, 35-310, Rzeszow, Poland.
Angelika MajkutInstitute of Health Sciences, Medical College, Rzeszow University, ul. Warzywna 1A, 35-310, Rzeszow, Poland.
Krzysztof MoskalInstitute of Health Sciences, Medical College, Rzeszow University, ul. Warzywna 1A, 35-310, Rzeszow, Poland.
Mateusz NiemiecInstitute of Health Sciences, Medical College, Rzeszow University, ul. Warzywna 1A, 35-310, Rzeszow, Poland.
Charles Philip GabelPrivate Researcher, PO Box 760, Coolum Beach, QLD, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8354-4545
University of Rzeszów · PLHoly Family Hospital · IN

Funding

University of Rzeszow -
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this study was a cross-cultural adaptation of the Spine Functional Index to produce a Polish version (SFI-PL). Further, the psychometric properties were evaluated with standardized criteria patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) in a symptomatic Polish spine population.

methodsLinguistic adaptation complied with the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) guidelines to produce the SFI-PL. Subjects with spine conditions, all areas and multi-area, were recruited from a Polish Specialist Hospital (n = 225, age = 45.7 ± 16.0 years, range 18-87, female = 60%, symptoms duration = 13.93 ± 27.56 weeks, range 5-84). Baseline internal consistency, reliability and validity were examined and included the SFI-PL, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Neck Disability Index (NDI), EuroQol 5 Dimensions, 5-level version (EQ-5D-5L) and an 11-point pain Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) with retest at 3-7 days (= 5 days). Practicality for readability was considered within the face and content validity and completion and scoring time calculated.

resultsStatistical analysis showed excellent internal consistency (α = 0.90) and high test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.98). The error score was determined with the SEM = 3.14 (MDC 90% CI = 7.33%). The construct validity analysis demonstrated strong correlations between the SFI-PL, the NDI (r = 0.73) and the ODI (r = 0.82); moderate with the EQ index value (0.70) and EQ-VAS (r = 0.56). Time to complete (229 s) and score (27 s) were determined.

conclusionsThe SFI-PL is a psychometrically sound PROM for Polish-speaking patients with spine conditions. The results support previous findings from the original-English and six other language versions for internal consistency, reliability, measurement error and validity. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Indexed as

Cross-Cultural ComparisonLanguageChild, PreschoolDisability EvaluationFemaleHumansInfantPolandPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesCross-cultural adaptationInternal consistencyReliabilitySpine Functional IndexValidity

Identifiers

PMID31893306
OpenAlexW2998031334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.