ArticlePorto biomedical journal
Preimplantation genetic testing for Huntington disease: the perspective of one Portuguese center.
Article in Porto biomedical journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genetic counseling for pre-implantation genetic testing of monogenic disorders (PGT-M).Frontiers in reproductive health · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHuntington disease (HD) is an autosomal dominant late-onset neurodegenerative disease caused by an unstable cytosine-adenine-guanine trinucleotide repeat expansion in the huntingtin (
methodsInformation about 15 HD couples referred for PGT and 21 cycles performed from 2009 to 2018 was collected retrospectively. PGT provide direct testing of embryos obtained after intracytoplasmic sperm injection, using polymerase chain reaction multiplex as the genetic testing protocol.
resultsPGT for HD was performed in 15 couples, with no history of previous attempts, in a total of 21 cycles. The mean number of biopsied embryos per cycle was 4.9. The amplification efficiency in blastomeres was 87.4%. From the 90 amplified embryos, 32 were normal and suitable for transfer. The mean number of transferred embryos per couple was 1.2.Overall, 3 positive human chorionic gonadotropin tests were obtained in 3 couples, resulting in 2 clinical pregnancies. The 2 ongoing clinical pregnancies had normal evolution, and culminated in 2 deliveries, resulting in the birth of 2 healthy children.
conclusionsPGT for HD is considered an effective and safe reproductive option for couples who are at risk of transmitting HD, when proper genetic and reproductive counseling is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.