Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31892938›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of emergency surgery : WJES2019

Antithrombotic drugs do not increase intraoperative blood loss in emergency gastrointestinal surgery: a single-institution propensity score analysis.

Tadashi Matsuoka, Kenji Kobayashi, Alan Kawarai Lefor, Junichi Sasaki, Hiroharu Shinozaki

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of emergency surgery : WJES, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Safety of urgent surgery for the patients with proximal femur fracture treated with platelet aggregation inhibitors: a propensity-score matching analysis.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2024
    Article
  3. Is emergency gastrointestinal system tumor surgery safe under treatment of antitrombotics?Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Tadashi Matsuoka1Department of Surgery, Saiseikai Utsunomiya Hospital, Tochigi, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-3837-8960
Kenji Kobayashi1Department of Surgery, Saiseikai Utsunomiya Hospital, Tochigi, Japan.
Alan Kawarai Lefor3Department of Surgery, Jichi Medical University, Tochigi, Japan.
Junichi Sasaki2Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, School of Medicine, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiroharu Shinozaki1Department of Surgery, Saiseikai Utsunomiya Hospital, Tochigi, Japan.
Keio University · JPSaiseikai Utsunomiya hospital · JPJichi Medical University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The use of antithrombotic drugs is increasing with the aging population. Prior to elective procedures, antithrombotic drugs are often discontinued. For emergency procedures in patients taking antithrombotic drugs, their effect cannot be attenuated which may lead to an increased risk of hemorrhagic events. However, there are few studies showing increased intraoperative blood loss in patients taking antithrombotic drugs who undergo emergency gastrointestinal surgery. The aim of this study is to determine whether the use of antithrombotic agents increases intraoperative blood loss in emergency gastrointestinal surgery. Methods: A retrospective review of patients who underwent emergency abdominal surgery between January 2013 and December 2017 was conducted. The primary outcome measure was intraoperative blood loss. Patients were divided into the antithrombotic drug group and a control group, and a propensity score was developed using multivariate logistic regression. We use 1:1 propensity score matching analysis to compare outcomes between the two groups. Results: Of 1555 patients included in this study, 1184 patients, including 170 patients taking antithrombotic drugs, were eligible for propensity score matching analysis. A 1:1 matching yielded 117 well-balanced pairs. There was no statistically significant difference in intraoperative blood loss (antithrombotic drug group vs control group, median (interquartile): 60 (225-10) vs 100 (243-10) ml, Conclusions: This study suggests that antithrombotic drugs do not increase intraoperative blood loss in patients undergoing emergency gastrointestinal surgery. Emergency gastrointestinal surgery for patients currently taking antithrombotic drugs can be performed safely, and the use of antithrombotic drugs is not a reason to delay surgical intervention.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBlood Loss, SurgicalDigestive System Surgical ProceduresFemaleFibrinolytic AgentsHemorrhageHumansJapanLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedPropensity ScoreRetrospective StudiesStatistics, NonparametricFibrinolytic AgentsAntithrombotic drugEmergency gastrointestinal surgeryIntraoperative blood loss

Identifiers

PMID31892938
PMCPMC6938014
OpenAlexW2997245128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.