Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31892747›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Defining the root endosphere and rhizosphere microbiomes from the World Olive Germplasm Collection.

Antonio J Fernández-González, Pablo J Villadas, Carmen Gómez-Lama Cabanás, Antonio Valverde-Corredor, Angjelina Belaj, Jesús Mercado-Blanco, Manuel Fernández-López

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 117 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Genomic signatures inmSystems · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Pitting the olive seed microbiome.Environmental microbiome · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Antonio J Fernández-GonzálezDepartamento de Microbiología del Suelo y Sistemas Simbióticos, Estación Experimental del Zaidín, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), Calle Profesor Albareda 1, 18008, Granada, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8781-8133
Pablo J VilladasDepartamento de Microbiología del Suelo y Sistemas Simbióticos, Estación Experimental del Zaidín, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), Calle Profesor Albareda 1, 18008, Granada, Spain.
Carmen Gómez-Lama CabanásDepartamento de Protección de Cultivos, Instituto de Agricultura Sostenible, CSIC. Campus 'Alameda del Obispo' s/n, Avd. Menéndez Pidal s/n, 14004, Córdoba, Spain.
Antonio Valverde-CorredorDepartamento de Protección de Cultivos, Instituto de Agricultura Sostenible, CSIC. Campus 'Alameda del Obispo' s/n, Avd. Menéndez Pidal s/n, 14004, Córdoba, Spain.
Angjelina BelajÁrea Mejora y Biotecnología, IFAPA-Centro Alameda del Obispo, Avda. Menéndez Pidal s/n, 14080, Córdoba, Spain.
Jesús Mercado-BlancoDepartamento de Protección de Cultivos, Instituto de Agricultura Sostenible, CSIC. Campus 'Alameda del Obispo' s/n, Avd. Menéndez Pidal s/n, 14004, Córdoba, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1895-5895
Manuel Fernández-LópezDepartamento de Microbiología del Suelo y Sistemas Simbióticos, Estación Experimental del Zaidín, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), Calle Profesor Albareda 1, 18008, Granada, Spain. manuel.fernandez@eez.csic.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2366-6908
Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas · ESInstituto de Agricultura Sostenible · ESAndalusian Institute of Agricultural and Fisheries Research and Training · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The bacterial and fungal communities from the olive (Olea europaea L.) root systems have not yet been simultaneously studied. We show in this work that microbial communities from the olive root endosphere are less diverse than those from the rhizosphere. But more relevant was to unveil that olive belowground communities are mainly shaped by the genotype of the cultivar when growing under the same environmental, pedological and agronomic conditions. Furthermore, Actinophytocola, Streptomyces and Pseudonocardia are the most abundant bacterial genera in the olive root endosphere, Actinophytocola being the most prevalent genus by far. In contrast, Gp6, Gp4, Rhizobium and Sphingomonas are the main genera in the olive rhizosphere. Canalisporium, Aspergillus, Minimelanolocus and Macrophomina are the main fungal genera present in the olive root system. Interestingly enough, a large number of as yet unclassified fungal sequences (class level) were detected in the rhizosphere. From the belowground microbial profiles here reported, it can be concluded that the genus Actinophytocola may play an important role in olive adaptation to environmental stresses. Moreover, the huge unknown fungal diversity here uncovered suggests that fungi with important ecological function and biotechnological potential are yet to be identified.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaMycobiomeRhizosphereBacteriaFungiOleaPlant RootsSoil Microbiology

Identifiers

PMID31892747
PMCPMC6938483
OpenAlexW2997711092

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.