Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31892648›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Little in Norway: a prospective longitudinal community-based cohort from pregnancy to child age 18 months.

Vibeke Moe, Eivor Fredriksen, Marian Kjellevold, Lisbeth Dahl, Maria Wik Markhus, Kjell Morten Stormark, Tilmann von Soest, Kåre Sten Olafsen, Unni Tranaas Vannebo, Lars Smith

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Vibeke MoeDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway vibeke.moe@psykologi.uio.no.ORCID 0000-0002-8436-8341
Eivor FredriksenDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Marian KjellevoldInstitute of Marine Research, Bergen, Norway.
Lisbeth DahlInstitute of Marine Research, Bergen, Norway.
Maria Wik MarkhusInstitute of Marine Research, Bergen, Norway.
Kjell Morten StormarkCentre for Child and Adolescent Mental Health Uni Health, Uni Research, Bergen, Norway.
Tilmann von SoestDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Kåre Sten OlafsenRegional Centre for Child and Adolescent Mental Health, East and South, Norway, Oslo, Norway.
Unni Tranaas VanneboRegional Centre for Child and Adolescent Mental Health, East and South, Norway, Oslo, Norway.
Lars SmithDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
University of Oslo · NONorwegian Institute of Marine Research · NOCenter for Child and Adolescent Mental Health, Eastern and Southern Norway · NOUni Research (Norway) · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe Little in Norway (LiN) project is a cross-disciplinary prospective longitudinal study starting in pregnancy. It was set up to investigate maternal and paternal mental health functioning in the transition to parenthood, detect pathways to healthy and aberrant child development and generate new knowledge about mechanisms underlying differential child mental health susceptibility.

participantsThe LiN cohort is a community-based sample comprising 1036 families (1036 mothers, 884 partners, 1017 children). All pregnant women and their partners receiving routine prenatal care at well-baby clinics at nine geographically selected sites across Norway were invited to participate. Enrolment took place from September 2011 to October 2012. This cohort profile comprises 10 data collection waves spanning from enrolment in pregnancy until child age 18 months. FINDINGS TO DATE: Four types of information have been collected: multi-informant questionnaire reports, direct observation of interaction, test data and biological samples. The most significant findings so far relate to three domains of results. First, when examining risk factors for parental mental health problems, results showed that the parents' own adverse childhood experiences and attachment style were related to anxiety, depression and stress in the perinatal period. The perception of difficult child temperament was also found to contribute to parenting stress in the first year after birth. Second, we studied how parental mental health risk factors were related to later child development and social emotional functioning, for example, linking maternal symptoms to social-emotional outcomes and paternal symptoms to language outcomes. Third, we investigated the relation between maternal nutrition during pregnancy and aspects of early child development. Results showed that mild to moderate maternal iodine deficiency in pregnancy was associated with poorer language skills up to 18 months, but not with reduced cognitive or fine and gross motor skills. FUTURE PLANS: A data collection point at 36 months is completed and currently being analysed. A new data collection wave is planned when the children are 8 years of age. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN66710572.

Indexed as

Child DevelopmentFathersMental HealthMothersAdultCohort StudiesFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornLongitudinal StudiesMaleMental DisordersNorwayPregnancyProspective Studieschild developmentcommunity-basedcross-disciplinarynutrition & dieteticsparental mental healthprospective longitudinal

Identifiers

PMID31892648
PMCPMC6955541
OpenAlexW2997376772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.