ArticleBMJ case reports2019
Rectosigmoid carcinoma presenting as full-thickness rectal prolapse.
Article in BMJ case reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Rectal prolapse as an initial presentation of colorectal cancer: a systematic review.BMC cancer · 2025Pooled it
- Anorectal emergencies: WSES-AAST guidelines.World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2021Pooled it
- Rectal adenocarcinoma presenting as full-thickness prolapse with external haemorrhoids: case report.Journal of surgical case reports · 2026Article
- Article
- Rectal Prolapse as a Rare Presentation of Colorectal Cancer: Case Series and Clinical Perspectives.Clinical and experimental gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Article
- Rectosigmoid intussusception due to large submucosal lipoma mimicking rectal prolapse.BMJ case reports · 2023Article
- Rectal prolapse as the initial presentation of rectal cancer-A case report.Frontiers in surgery · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A 34-year-old man with recent-onset constipation presented with colonic obstruction due to a palpable rectal tumour. Colostomy relieved the obstruction and biopsy revealed carcinoma. During workup, full-thickness rectal prolapse occurred with the tumour at the apex of an intussusception. Imaging revealed a low rectal tumour and no metastases. An abdominal oncological rather than perineal resection of the rectum was planned. At laparotomy, the tumour was reduced and was seen to originate at the rectosigmoid junction. Surgery was successful and follow-up has been clear. Histology revealed an adenocarcinoma with microsatellite instability. Rectal prolapse due to tumour intussusception is very rare. In this young man, it was due to straining at stool because of constipation and tenesmus rather than pelvic floor abnormality. An associated colorectal tumour should be considered in patients with rectal prolapse. In such cases, surgical and adjuvant management may need to be modified.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.