Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31892409›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2020

Rapid Simulation of Unprocessed DEER Decay Data for Protein Fold Prediction.

Diego Del Alamo, Maxx H Tessmer, Richard A Stein, Jimmy B Feix, Hassane S Mchaourab, Jens Meiler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Protein Modeling with DEER Spectroscopy.Annual review of biophysics · 2025
    Review
  4. Modeling of Cu(II)-based protein spin labels using rotamer libraries.Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Integrated AlphaFold2 and DEER investigation of the conformational dynamics of a pH-dependent APC antiporter.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Time-resolved DEER EPR and solid-state NMR afford kinetic and structural elucidation of substrate binding to CaProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Diego Del AlamoDepartment of Chemistry and Center for Structural Biology; Department of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee.
Maxx H TessmerDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology.
Richard A SteinDepartment of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee.
Jimmy B FeixDepartment of Biophysics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Hassane S MchaourabDepartment of Chemistry and Center for Structural Biology; Department of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee.
Jens MeilerDepartment of Chemistry and Center for Structural Biology; Institut for Drug Discovery, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany. Electronic address: jens.meiler@vanderbilt.edu.

Funding

Decrypting Variants of Uncertain Significance in Long-QT SyndromeR01HL122010 · NHLBI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI GEORGE, ALFRED L., SANDERS, CHARLES R · 2014 to 2025
$15.5M
ROSETTA An Integrated Protein Structure Modeling SuiteR01GM073151 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI KUHLMAN, BRIAN A · 2005 to 2019
$7.8M
Structural Dynamics of Multi-drug TransportersR01GM077659 · NIGMS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI MCHAOURAB, HASSANE S · 2006 to 2023
$5.0M
Type III effector-cofactor dynamics within the cellular environmentR01AI104922 · NIAID · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI FEIX, JIMMY, FRANK, DARA W. · 2013 to 2021
$3.7M
Membrane Protein Structure Elucidation from sparse NMR data (KAMP)R01GM080403 · NIGMS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI MEILER, JENS · 2007 to 2019
$3.0M
Structural basis for caveolae assembly and functionR01HL144131 · NHLBI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI KENWORTHY, ANNE K, OHI, MELANIE DIANE · 2018 to 2021
$2.2M
Mechanism of Activation and Membrane Interactions of Pseudomonas toxin ExoUR01GM114234 · NIGMS · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI FEIX, JIMMY · 2015 to 2018
$1.2M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL122010NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL144131NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI104922NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM073151NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM077659NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM080403NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM114234
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite advances in sampling and scoring strategies, Monte Carlo modeling methods still struggle to accurately predict de novo the structures of large proteins, membrane proteins, or proteins of complex topologies. Previous approaches have addressed these shortcomings by leveraging sparse distance data gathered using site-directed spin labeling and electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy to improve protein structure prediction and refinement outcomes. However, existing computational implementations entail compromises between coarse-grained models of the spin label that lower the resolution and explicit models that lead to resource-intense simulations. These methods are further limited by their reliance on distance distributions, which are calculated from a primary refocused echo decay signal and contain uncertainties that may require manual refinement. Here, we addressed these challenges by developing RosettaDEER, a scoring method within the Rosetta software suite capable of simulating double electron-electron resonance spectroscopy decay traces and distance distributions between spin labels fast enough to fold proteins de novo. We demonstrate that the accuracy of resulting distance distributions match or exceed those generated by more computationally intensive methods. Moreover, decay traces generated from these distributions recapitulate intermolecular background coupling parameters even when the time window of data collection is truncated. As a result, RosettaDEER can discriminate between poorly folded and native-like models by using decay traces that cannot be accurately converted into distance distributions using regularized fitting approaches. Finally, using two challenging test cases, we demonstrate that RosettaDEER leverages these experimental data for protein fold prediction more effectively than previous methods. These benchmarking results confirm that RosettaDEER can effectively leverage sparse experimental data for a wide array of modeling applications built into the Rosetta software suite.

Indexed as

Electron Spin Resonance SpectroscopyMonte Carlo MethodProtein FoldingNitrogen OxidesSpin LabelsTime FactorsNitrogen OxidesnitroxylSpin Labels

Identifiers

PMID31892409
PMCPMC6976798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.