ArticleBiophysical journal2020
Rapid Simulation of Unprocessed DEER Decay Data for Protein Fold Prediction.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Direct observation and measurement of the average quantum methyl-tunneling frequency in a protein usingChemical communications (Cambridge, England) · 2026Article
- ProGuide: a flexible framework for modeling global conformational rearrangements in proteins using DEER-derived distance restraints.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Protein Modeling with DEER Spectroscopy.Annual review of biophysics · 2025Review
- Modeling of Cu(II)-based protein spin labels using rotamer libraries.Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP · 2024Article
- A novel approach to modeling side chain ensembles of the bifunctional spin label RX.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- chiLife: An open-source Python package for in silico spin labeling and integrative protein modeling.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- Integration of Nanometer-Range Label-to-Label Distances and Their Distributions into Modelling Approaches.Biomolecules · 2022Review
- Comparative evaluation of spin-label modeling methods for protein structural studies.Biophysical journal · 2022Article
- Integrated AlphaFold2 and DEER investigation of the conformational dynamics of a pH-dependent APC antiporter.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022Article
- Modeling of protein conformational changes with Rosetta guided by limited experimental data.Structure (London, England : 1993) · 2022Article
- Time-resolved DEER EPR and solid-state NMR afford kinetic and structural elucidation of substrate binding to CaProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022Article
- AlphaFold2 predicts the inward-facing conformation of the multidrug transporter LmrP.Proteins · 2021Article
- Methodology for rigorous modeling of protein conformational changes by Rosetta using DEER distance restraints.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
- Prediction of Protein Complex Structure Using Surface-Induced Dissociation and Cryo-Electron Microscopy.Analytical chemistry · 2021Article
- DEER Analysis of GPCR Conformational Heterogeneity.Biomolecules · 2021Review
- DEER-PREdict: Software for efficient calculation of spin-labeling EPR and NMR data from conformational ensembles.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
- Hybrid methods for combined experimental and computational determination of protein structure.The Journal of chemical physics · 2020Review
- Characterization of the ExoU activation mechanism using EPR and integrative modeling.Scientific reports · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite advances in sampling and scoring strategies, Monte Carlo modeling methods still struggle to accurately predict de novo the structures of large proteins, membrane proteins, or proteins of complex topologies. Previous approaches have addressed these shortcomings by leveraging sparse distance data gathered using site-directed spin labeling and electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy to improve protein structure prediction and refinement outcomes. However, existing computational implementations entail compromises between coarse-grained models of the spin label that lower the resolution and explicit models that lead to resource-intense simulations. These methods are further limited by their reliance on distance distributions, which are calculated from a primary refocused echo decay signal and contain uncertainties that may require manual refinement. Here, we addressed these challenges by developing RosettaDEER, a scoring method within the Rosetta software suite capable of simulating double electron-electron resonance spectroscopy decay traces and distance distributions between spin labels fast enough to fold proteins de novo. We demonstrate that the accuracy of resulting distance distributions match or exceed those generated by more computationally intensive methods. Moreover, decay traces generated from these distributions recapitulate intermolecular background coupling parameters even when the time window of data collection is truncated. As a result, RosettaDEER can discriminate between poorly folded and native-like models by using decay traces that cannot be accurately converted into distance distributions using regularized fitting approaches. Finally, using two challenging test cases, we demonstrate that RosettaDEER leverages these experimental data for protein fold prediction more effectively than previous methods. These benchmarking results confirm that RosettaDEER can effectively leverage sparse experimental data for a wide array of modeling applications built into the Rosetta software suite.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.