Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31892324›Full record

ArticleInternational journal for equity in health2019

Social inequalities in the burden of care: a dyadic analysis in the caregiving partners of persons with a physical disability.

Hannah Tough, Martin W G Brinkhof, Johannes Siegrist, Christine Fekete, SwiSCI Study Group

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal for equity in health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Factors influencing the caregiver burden on primary family caregivers of stroke survivors: a scoping review.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Bridging the gap: a translational perspective in spinal cord injury.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hannah ToughSwiss Paraplegic Research, Guido A. Zäch Strasse 4, 6207, Nottwil, Switzerland.
Martin W G BrinkhofSwiss Paraplegic Research, Guido A. Zäch Strasse 4, 6207, Nottwil, Switzerland.
Johannes SiegristSenior Professorship 'Work Stress Research', Faculty of Medicine, University of Düsseldorf, Life-Science-Center, Merowingerplatz 1A, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Christine FeketeSwiss Paraplegic Research, Guido A. Zäch Strasse 4, 6207, Nottwil, Switzerland. christine.fekete@paraplegie.ch.ORCID 0000-0002-3753-3017
SwiSCI Study Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSocioeconomic position (SEP) is an important contextual factor in the Stress Process Model of caregiving. However, the basic assumption that low SEP is associated with greater caregiver burden has so far lacked empirical support. The objective of this study was to investigate social inequalities in the caregiver burden among caregiving partners of persons with a physical disability, i.e., spinal cord injury (SCI), applying a dyadic approach. More specifically, we investigated 1) the association of the caregivers' SEP with caregiver burden ('actor effect'); 2) the association of the care-receivers' SEP with caregiver burden ('partner effect'), and 3) potential mediators of the association between SEP and caregiver burden.

methodsCross-sectional survey data from 118 couples of persons with SCI and their partners living in Switzerland was used. We firstly employed logistic regression to investigate the actor and partner effects of SEP on objective (hours of caregiving) and subjective caregiver burden (Zarit Burden Interview). We additionally used structural equation modelling to explore whether unfulfilled support needs, psychosocial resources and the care-receivers health status mediated the association between SEP and caregiver burden. SEP was operationalized by household income, education, subjective social position, financial strain and home ownership.

resultsWe observed a consistent trend towards higher objective and subjective burden in lower SEP groups. Caregivers with higher subjective social positon and home ownership indicated lower subjective burden, and caregivers with higher education and absence of financial strain reported lower objective burden. Further evidence suggested a partner effect of SEP on caregiver burden, whereby objective caregiver burden was reduced in couples where the care-receiver had a higher educational level. The negative association between SEP and subjective burden was partially mediated by the unfulfilled support needs and deprived psychological resources of the caregiver, and the poor health status of the care-receiver. Similar mediation effects were not supported for objective burden.

conclusionsOur study, in the context of SCI, provides support for the contextual role of SEP in the Stress Process Model of caregiving. To reduce subjective caregiver burden, policy programs may target the strengthening of psychosocial resources, or the improvement of access to support services for caregivers with low SEP.

Indexed as

Cost of IllnessInterpersonal RelationsPersons with DisabilitiesAdultCaregiversCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedModels, PsychologicalSocial ClassSpinal Cord InjuriesSpousesStress, PsychologicalSwitzerlandCaregiver burdenDyadic analysisInequalitiesMediationSocio-economic positionSpinal cord injuryStress process model of caregiving

Identifiers

PMID31892324
PMCPMC6938621

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.