Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31892272›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2019

Folding Rate Optimization Promotes Frustrated Interactions in Entangled Protein Structures.

Federico Norbiato, Flavio Seno, Antonio Trovato, Marco Baiesi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Folding kinetics of an entangled protein.PLoS computational biology · 2023
    Article
  2. Entangled Motifs in Membrane Protein Structures.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Federico NorbiatoDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Padova, Via Marzolo 8, I-35131 Padova, Italy.
Flavio SenoDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Padova, Via Marzolo 8, I-35131 Padova, Italy.
Antonio TrovatoDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Padova, Via Marzolo 8, I-35131 Padova, Italy.
Marco BaiesiDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Padova, Via Marzolo 8, I-35131 Padova, Italy.

Funding

Università degli Studi di Padova Progetto di Ricerca Dipartimentale BIRD173122/17
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many native structures of proteins accomodate complex topological motifs such as knots, lassos, and other geometrical entanglements. How proteins can fold quickly even in the presence of such topological obstacles is a debated question in structural biology. Recently, the hypothesis that energetic frustration might be a mechanism to avoid topological frustration has been put forward based on the empirical observation that loops involved in entanglements are stabilized by weak interactions between amino-acids at their extrema. To verify this idea, we use a toy lattice model for the folding of proteins into two almost identical structures, one entangled and one not. As expected, the folding time is longer when random sequences folds into the entangled structure. This holds also under an evolutionary pressure simulated by optimizing the folding time. It turns out that optmized protein sequences in the entangled structure are in fact characterized by frustrated interactions at the closures of entangled loops. This phenomenon is much less enhanced in the control case where the entanglement is not present. Our findings, which are in agreement with experimental observations, corroborate the idea that an evolutionary pressure shapes the folding funnel to avoid topological and kinetic traps.

Indexed as

Amino AcidsFrustrationKineticsProtein FoldingProteinsAmino AcidsProteinsentanglementprotein foldingtopological frustration

Identifiers

PMID31892272
PMCPMC6981561

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.