Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31892159›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2019

Sex Differences in Becoming a Current Electronic Cigarette User, Current Smoker and Current Dual User of Both Products: A Longitudinal Study among Mexican Adolescents.

Rosibel Rodríguez-Bolaños, Edna Arillo-Santillán, Inti Barrientos-Gutiérrez, Luis Zavala-Arciniega, Charity A Ntansah, James F Thrasher

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Preventive medicine reports · 2025
    Review
  4. Attitudes, Behaviors, and Perceptions of Students Vaping in Three Mexican Universities.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  5. Sex Differences in E-Cigarette Use and Related Health Effects.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. E-Cigarette Toxicology.Annual review of pharmacology and toxicology · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rosibel Rodríguez-BolañosPopulation Health Research Center, Mexican National Institute of Public Health, Av. Universidad 655 Col. Santa María Ahuacatitlán, Cuernavaca, Morelos 62100, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0001-5728-5308
Edna Arillo-SantillánPopulation Health Research Center, Mexican National Institute of Public Health, Av. Universidad 655 Col. Santa María Ahuacatitlán, Cuernavaca, Morelos 62100, Mexico.
Inti Barrientos-GutiérrezCenter for Evaluation and Survey Research, Mexican National Institute of Public Health, Av. Universidad 655 Col. Santa María Ahuacatitlán, Cuernavaca, Morelos 62100, Mexico.
Luis Zavala-ArciniegaDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Charity A NtansahDepartment of Health Promotion, Education & Behavior, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA.
James F ThrasherPopulation Health Research Center, Mexican National Institute of Public Health, Av. Universidad 655 Col. Santa María Ahuacatitlán, Cuernavaca, Morelos 62100, Mexico.

Funding

Cinema Smoking and Youth Smoking in Latin AmericaR01TW009274 · FIC · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI SARGENT, JAMES D., THRASHER, JAMES · 2012 to 2016
$1.8M
Electronic cigarettes in Latin America: Evaluation of impacts and policy optionsR01TW010652 · FIC · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI BARNOYA, JOAQUIN, THRASHER, JAMES · 2018 to 2021
$1.6M
FIC NIH HHS R01 TW009274FIC NIH HHS R01 TW010652NIH HHS R01 TW010652
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to assess sex differences in predictors for becoming a current exclusive electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) user, current exclusive smoker, or current dual user (concurrent smoking and e-cigarette use). This longitudinal study included 2399 females and 2177 males who had tried neither cigarettes nor e-cigarettes at baseline and attended 57 middle schools in the three largest cities in Mexico. We estimated multinomial logistic models stratified by sex. At follow-up, the prevalence of current exclusive e-cigarette use was 6.4% for males and 5.5% for females; current exclusive smoking was similar among males (3.6%) and females (3.5%); dual use was 2.4% females and 1.8% males. In the adjusted model, current e-cigarette use among females was associated with baseline current drinking (ARR = 1.85;

Indexed as

AdolescentAdolescent BehaviorAlcohol DrinkingElectronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsLongitudinal StudiesMaleMexicoPrevalenceRisk FactorsSex FactorsSmokersTobacco SmokingVapingadolescentscigarette smokingelectronic cigarettesMexicosex difference

Identifiers

PMID31892159
PMCPMC6981723

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.