Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31891610›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

HomeSTEAD's physical activity and screen media practices and beliefs survey: Instrument development and integrated conceptual model.

Amber E Vaughn, Derek P Hales, Cody D Neshteruk, Dianne S Ward

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. The relationship between the home environment and child adiposity: a systematic review.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Amber E VaughnCenter for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-1249-6405
Derek P HalesCenter for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America.
Cody D NeshterukDepartment of Nutrition, Gillings School of Global Public Health, the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America.
Dianne S WardCenter for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America.

Funding

UNC CENTER FOR HEALTH PROMOTION AND DISEASE PREVENTIONU48DP001944 · DP · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI AMMERMAN, ALICE S · 2009 to 2013
$15.1M
Development of a Survey to Assess Diet and Activity Environments in the HomeR21CA134986 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI WARD, DIANNE STANTON · 2009 to 2010
$360k
ACL HHS U48DP001944NCCDPHP CDC HHS U48 DP001944NCI NIH HHS R21 CA134986
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The home environment has a significant influence on children's physical activity and obesity risk. Our understanding of this environment is limited by current measurement tools. The Home Self-administered Tool for Environmental assessment of Activity and Diet addresses this gap. This paper describes the development and psychometric testing of its family physical activity and screen media practices and beliefs survey.

methodsSurvey development was guided by the Analysis Grid for Environments Linked to Obesity (ANGELO) framework and informed by a literature review, expert opinion, and cognitive interviews. Parents of children ages 3-12 years (n = 129) completed the HomeSTEAD survey three times over 12-18 days. Additionally, parents reported on child behaviors and trained staff measured parent and child height and weight. Five exploratory factor analyses were conducted after categorizing items into: control of physical activity, control of screen media, explicit modeling, implicit modeling, and perceived barriers and facilitators. Scales with 3 or more items underwent scale reduction. Psychometric testing evaluated internal consistency (Chronbach's alphas), test-retest reliability (analysis of variance and intraclass correlations (ICC)), and construct validity (correlations with child BMI, physical activity, screen time). An integrated conceptual model of parent physical activity and screen media practices and beliefs was developed based on recent literature to aid in the identification and naming of constructs.

resultsFinal scales demonstrated good internal consistency (median Cronbach's alpha = 0.81, IQR = 0.74-0.85), test-retest reliability (median ICC = 0.70, IQR = 0.66-0.78), and construct validity (with correlations between scale score and children's behaviors generally in the expected direction). Comparison with the integrated conceptual model showed that most identified constructs were captured.

conclusionsThe family physical activity and screen media practices survey advances the measurement of the home environment related to children's physical activity, screen time, and weight. The integrated conceptual model provides a useful framework for researchers studying both physical activity and screen media parenting practices.

Indexed as

Parent-Child RelationsAdultBody WeightChildChild BehaviorChild, PreschoolExerciseFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHealth BehaviorHumansMaleModels, PsychologicalObesityParentingParents

Identifiers

PMID31891610
PMCPMC6938346

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.