Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31891608›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Kyasanur Forest Disease vaccination coverage and its perceived barriers in Goa, India-A mixed methods operational research.

Annet Oliveira, Kalaiselvi Selvaraj, Jaya Prasad Tripathy, Utkarsh Betodkar, Jagadish Cacodcar, Abhijit Wadkar

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Annet OliveiraIntegrated Disease Surveillance Programme, Directorate of Health Services, Panaji, Goa, India.ORCID 0000-0003-2889-2410
Kalaiselvi SelvarajAll India Institute of Medical Sciences, Nagpur, India.
Jaya Prasad TripathyAll India Institute of Medical Sciences, Nagpur, India.
Utkarsh BetodkarState Surveillance Officer, Directorate of Health Services, Panaji, Goa, India.
Jagadish CacodcarDepartment of Preventive and Social Medicine, Goa Medical College, Bambolim, Goa, India.
Abhijit WadkarMedical Officer, Directorate of Health Services, Panaji, Goa, India.
Voluntary Health Association of Goa · INAll India Institute of Medical Sciences, Nagpur · INGoa Medical College · INInternational Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundKyasanur Forest Disease (KFD) is a highly infectious viral illness transmitted by infected ticks through contact with monkeys and other forest animals. Till date there is no definite treatment available for KFD. Hence, vaccination is considered to be an important public health intervention to control KFD. This study aimed at estimating the vaccination coverage for primary and booster doses of KFD vaccine and exploring the perceived barriers to vaccination in the affected villages of Goa, India during 2015-18. METHODOLOGY & PRINCIPAL

findingsIn this explanatory mixed methods study, vaccine coverage was estimated bydata obtained from the KFD vaccination registers maintained at the health centers catering to the KFD affected villages. To understand the barriers to vaccination,key informant interviews were conducted among implementing health officers, medical officers and nurses involved in vaccination. Perceptions of vaccinees and community members were studied through in-depth interviews and focus group discussions. Out of the 35,500 targeted population (6-65 years)for KFD vaccination, 32% received one dose and 13.2% received two doses. The coverage for first booster and annual booster was 4.9% and 0.5% respectively. The drop out from first to second and third doses was 57% and 85% respectively. 69% of doses were delivered during community outreach programmes and remaining at health facilities. Inadequate vaccine stock, inappropriate timing of vaccination campaign, lack of awareness and misconceptions related to indications of vaccines, travel distance for follow up doses given at community health centre and pain due to injection were perceived as reasons for poor vaccination coverage.

conclusionsKFD vaccination coverage was poor in the villages affected by KFD in Goa. Both left-out and drop-out phenomena were observed in KFD vaccination. Vaccine implementation plan has to consider suitable time for the local people, maintain adequate vaccine stock and encourage community-based vaccination campaigns instead of facility-based to achieve optimal vaccine coverage.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultChildCommunity-Institutional RelationsCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansImmunization, SecondaryIndiaKyasanur Forest DiseaseMaleMass VaccinationMiddle AgedOperations ResearchPatient DropoutsPublic Health

Identifiers

PMID31891608
PMCPMC6938374
OpenAlexW2997232346

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.