Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31891598›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Electronic cigarettes and insulin resistance in animals and humans: Results of a controlled animal study and the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES 2013-2016).

Olusola A Orimoloye, S M Iftekhar Uddin, Lung-Chi Chen, Albert D Osei, Mohammadhassan Mirbolouk, Marina V Malovichko, Israel D Sithu, Omar Dzaye, Daniel J Conklin, Sanjay Srivastava and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. E-cigarette Use and Incident Cardiometabolic Conditions in the All of Us Research Program.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Olusola A OrimoloyeJohns Hopkins Ciccarone Center for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-6858-1057
S M Iftekhar UddinJohns Hopkins Ciccarone Center for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Lung-Chi ChenAmerican Heart Association Tobacco Regulation and Addiction Center, Dallas, Texas, United States of America.
Albert D OseiJohns Hopkins Ciccarone Center for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-3901-0471
Mohammadhassan MirboloukJohns Hopkins Ciccarone Center for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Marina V MalovichkoAmerican Heart Association Tobacco Regulation and Addiction Center, Dallas, Texas, United States of America.
Israel D SithuAmerican Heart Association Tobacco Regulation and Addiction Center, Dallas, Texas, United States of America.
Omar DzayeJohns Hopkins Ciccarone Center for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Daniel J ConklinAmerican Heart Association Tobacco Regulation and Addiction Center, Dallas, Texas, United States of America.
Sanjay SrivastavaAmerican Heart Association Tobacco Regulation and Addiction Center, Dallas, Texas, United States of America.
Michael J BlahaJohns Hopkins Ciccarone Center for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
American Heart Association · USJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

ConProject-006U54HL120163 · NHLBI · AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION · PI BHATNAGAR, ARUNI, ROBERTSON, ROSE MARIE · 2018 to 2022
$18.8M
TBDP30GM127607 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE · PI HILL, BRADFORD GUY · 2018 to 2022
$6.3M
Cardiovascular Toxicity of Tobacco Products and ConstituentsR01HL122676 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE · PI CONKLIN, DANIEL JOSEPH · 2015 to 2019
$3.7M
Tobacco Products and Atherosclerotic DiseaseR01HL120746 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE · PI SRIVASTAVA, SANJAY · 2013 to 2017
$3.7M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL120746NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL122676NHLBI NIH HHS U54 HL120163NIGMS NIH HHS P30 GM127607
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe popularity of electronic cigarettes (E-cigarettes) has risen considerably. Several studies have suggested that nicotine may affect insulin resistance, however, the impact of E-cigarette exposure on insulin resistance, an early measure of cardiometabolic risk, is not known. METHODS AND

resultsUsing experimental animals and human data obtained from 3,989 participants of the United States National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), respectively, we assessed the association between E-cigarette and conventional cigarette exposures and insulin resistance, as modelled using the homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) and glucose tolerance tests (GTT). C57BL6/J mice (on standard chow diet) exposed to E-cigarette aerosol or mainstream cigarette smoke (MCS) for 12 weeks showed HOMA-IR and GTT levels comparable with filtered air-exposed controls. In the NHANES cohort, there was no significant association between defined tobacco product use categories (non-users; sole E-cigarette users; cigarette smokers and dual users) and insulin resistance. Compared with non-users of e-cigarettes/conventional cigarettes, sole E-cigarette users showed no significant difference in HOMA-IR or GTT levels following adjustment for age, sex, race, physical activity, alcohol use and BMI.

conclusionE-cigarettes do not appear to be linked with insulin resistance. Our findings may inform future studies assessing potential cardiometabolic harms associated with E-cigarette use.

Indexed as

Insulin ResistanceAdolescentAdultAgedAnimalsCohort StudiesCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGlucose Tolerance TestHumansMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMiddle AgedSmokingSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID31891598
PMCPMC6938328
OpenAlexW2997487768

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.