ArticlePloS one2019
A framework for the development of a global standardised marine taxon reference image database (SMarTaR-ID) to support image-based analyses.
Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dog-Assisted Therapy vs Relaxation for Children and Adolescents with Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder: A Randomized Controlled Study.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2024Trial
- Deep blueprint: A literature review and guide to automated image classification for ecologists.The Journal of animal ecology · 2026Review
- Biodiversity of the abyssal and hadal zone in the Nova Canton Trough (Central Pacific Ocean; 2751-7989 m): a visual inventory.Biodiversity data journal · 2026Article
- Faunal biodiversity of the lower abyssal and hadal zones of the Japan, Ryukyu and Izu-Ogasawara trenches (NW Pacific Ocean; 4534-9775 m).Biodiversity data journal · 2026Article
- Fine-scale spatial organisation of deep-sea sea pens in a NE atlantic submarine canyon conservation area.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Predicting the Distribution of Mesophotic Coral Ecosystems in the Chagos Archipelago.Ecology and evolution · 2025Article
- Tools and approaches for mapping Marine Animal Forests: A practical overview for researchers and conservationists.Open research Europe · 2025Review
- Deep-sea ecosystems in the north-eastern Alboran Sea (western Mediterranean): quantifying assemblages and anthropogenic activity in the Seco de los Olivos Bank.Marine biodiversity : a journal of the Senckenberg Research Institute · 2025Article
- An in situ digital synthesis strategy for the discovery and description of ocean life.Science advances · 2024Article
- An underwater imagery identification guide for shallow, mesophotic and deep-sea benthos in Maldives.Biodiversity data journal · 2024Article
- Article
- Mesophotic coral bleaching associated with changes in thermocline depth.Nature communications · 2023Article
- FathomNet: A global image database for enabling artificial intelligence in the ocean.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Article
- Benthic megafaunal biodiversity of the Charlie-Gibbs fracture zone: spatial variation, potential drivers, and conservation status.Marine biodiversity : a journal of the Senckenberg Research Institute · 2022Article
- Expanding conservation culturomics and iEcology from terrestrial to aquatic realms.PLoS biology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
34 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Video and image data are regularly used in the field of benthic ecology to document biodiversity. However, their use is subject to a number of challenges, principally the identification of taxa within the images without associated physical specimens. The challenge of applying traditional taxonomic keys to the identification of fauna from images has led to the development of personal, group, or institution level reference image catalogues of operational taxonomic units (OTUs) or morphospecies. Lack of standardisation among these reference catalogues has led to problems with observer bias and the inability to combine datasets across studies. In addition, lack of a common reference standard is stifling efforts in the application of artificial intelligence to taxon identification. Using the North Atlantic deep sea as a case study, we propose a database structure to facilitate standardisation of morphospecies image catalogues between research groups and support future use in multiple front-end applications. We also propose a framework for coordination of international efforts to develop reference guides for the identification of marine species from images. The proposed structure maps to the Darwin Core standard to allow integration with existing databases. We suggest a management framework where high-level taxonomic groups are curated by a regional team, consisting of both end users and taxonomic experts. We identify a mechanism by which overall quality of data within a common reference guide could be raised over the next decade. Finally, we discuss the role of a common reference standard in advancing marine ecology and supporting sustainable use of this ecosystem.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.