Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31891242›Full record

ArticleObesity (Silver Spring, Md.)2020

Differential Effects of Diet and Weight on Taste Responses in Diet-Induced Obese Mice.

Zachary C Ahart, Laura E Martin, Bailey R Kemp, Debarghya Dutta Banik, Stefan G E Roberts, Ann-Marie Torregrossa, Kathryn F Medler

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Nutrient Sensing by Lingual G-Protein-Coupled Taste Receptors.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  5. Bitter taste receptors as sensors of gut luminal contents.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Zachary C AhartDepartment of Biological Sciences, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, New York, USA.
Laura E MartinDepartment of Psychology, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, New York, USA.
Bailey R KempDepartment of Biological Sciences, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, New York, USA.
Debarghya Dutta BanikDepartment of Biological Sciences, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, New York, USA.
Stefan G E RobertsDepartment of Biological Sciences, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, New York, USA.
Ann-Marie TorregrossaDepartment of Psychology, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, New York, USA.
Kathryn F MedlerDepartment of Biological Sciences, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9664-3606
University at Buffalo, State University of New York · USUniversity of Bristol · GB

Funding

Salivary Protein Influence on Taste and FeedingR01DC016869 · NIDCD · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI TORREGROSSA, ANN-MARIE · 2019 to 2023
$1.8M
Functional analysis of the WT1-BASP1 transcriptional repressor complexR01GM098609 · NIGMS · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI MEDLER, KATHRYN, ROBERTS, STEFAN · 2012 to 2015
$1.2M
Calcium Buffering Mechanisms in Taste CellsR03DC006358 · NIDCD · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI MEDLER, KATHRYN · 2004 to 2006
$235k
NIDCD NIH HHS DC016869NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC016869NIDCD NIH HHS R03 DC006358NIGMS NIH HHS DC006358NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM098609
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePrevious studies have reported that individuals with obesity have reduced taste perception, but the relationship between obesity and taste is poorly understood. Earlier work has demonstrated that diet-induced obesity directly impairs taste. Currently, it is not clear whether these changes to taste are due to obesity or to the high-fat diet exposure. The goal of the current study was to determine whether diet or excess weight is responsible for the taste deficits induced by diet-induced obesity.

methodsC57BL/6 mice were placed on either high-fat or standard chow in the presence or absence of captopril. Mice on captopril did not gain weight when exposed to a high-fat diet. Changes in the responses to different taste stimuli were evaluated using live cell imaging, brief-access licking, immunohistochemistry, and real-time polymerase chain reaction.

resultsDiet and weight gain each affected taste responses, but their effects varied by stimulus. Two key signaling proteins, α-gustducin and phospholipase Cβ2, were significantly reduced in the mice on the high-fat diet with and without weight gain, identifying a potential mechanism for the reduced taste responsiveness to some stimuli.

conclusionsOur data indicate that, for some stimuli, diet alone can cause taste deficits, even without the onset of obesity.

Indexed as

AnimalsBody WeightDiet, High-FatMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, ObeseObesityTaste Perception

Identifiers

PMID31891242
PMCPMC6981059
OpenAlexW2997272360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.