ArticleJSES open access2019
Defining the tipping point for primary shoulder arthroplasty.
Article in JSES open access, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- What factors impact patients' decision to undergo shoulder surgery and subjective feeling of recovery?JSES reviews, reports, and techniques · 2025Article
- Radiological changes in shoulder osteoarthritis and pain sensation correlate with patients' age.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2022Article
- Clinical Fate of Glenohumeral Osteoarthritis Following Intraarticular Corticosteroid Injection: An Analysis in 311 Shoulders.Journal of shoulder and elbow arthroplasty · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlthough risk factors for poor outcomes and complications have been studied, there remain limited objective criteria to guide surgeons about the timing of arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to further characterize the tipping-point scores for a group of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in patients undergoing primary shoulder arthroplasty.
methodsWe retrospectively reviewed 5670 primary shoulder arthroplasties (1833 anatomic total shoulder arthroplasties and 3837 reverse shoulder arthroplasties [RSAs]) performed over a 10-year period. Preoperative range of motion, PROMs (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, Simple Shoulder Test, and Shoulder Pain and Disability Index scores), and Constant scores were evaluated. The tipping point for each PROM was evaluated. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to assess risk factors for lower tipping points.
resultsPatients undergoing RSA demonstrated lower tipping points for all range-of-motion parameters as well as American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, Shoulder Pain and Disability Index, and Simple Shoulder Test scores. Female sex was predictive of a lower tipping point prior to shoulder arthroplasty, regardless of implant type. When the total shoulder arthroplasty subgroup was evaluated, both female sex and a higher body mass index were shown to be associated with a lower tipping point. DISCUSSION: The choice to undergo shoulder arthroplasty is a multifactorial decision that encompasses both physical and social factors. Female patients and patients undergoing RSA are more likely to accept slightly worse shoulder function prior to making the decision to undergo shoulder arthroplasty.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.