Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31890875›Full record

ReviewLaryngoscope investigative otolaryngology2019

Reconstruction of segmental mandibular defects: Current procedures and perspectives.

Arnaud Paré, Adeline Bossard, Boris Laure, Pierre Weiss, Olivier Gauthier, Pierre Corre

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Arnaud ParéService de Chirurgie Maxillo Faciale Plastique et Brulés, Hôpital Trousseau, CHU de Tours Tours France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6060-5077
Adeline BossardONIRIS Nantes-Atlantic College of Veterinary Medicine Centre de Rechecherche et D'investigation Préclinique (CRIP) Nantes France.
Boris LaureService de Chirurgie Maxillo Faciale Plastique et Brulés, Hôpital Trousseau, CHU de Tours Tours France.
Pierre WeissLaboratoire Regenerative Medicine and Skeleton RMeS, France INSERM, U 1229 Nantes France.
Olivier GauthierLaboratoire Regenerative Medicine and Skeleton RMeS, France INSERM, U 1229 Nantes France.
Pierre CorreLaboratoire Regenerative Medicine and Skeleton RMeS, France INSERM, U 1229 Nantes France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe reconstruction of segmental mandibular defects remains a challenge for the reconstructive surgeon, from both a functional and an esthetic point of view.

methodsThis clinical review examines the different techniques currently in use for mandibular reconstruction as related to a range of etiologies, including the different bone donor sites, the alternatives to free flaps (FFs), as well as the contribution of computer-assisted surgery. Recent progress and the perspectives in bone tissue engineering (BTE) are also discussed.

resultsOsseous FF allows reliable and satisfying outcomes. However, locoregional flap, distraction osteogenesis, or even induced membrane techniques are other potential options in less favorable cases. Obtaining an engineered bone with satisfactory mechanical properties and sufficient vascular supply requires further investigations.

conclusionsOsseous FF procedure remains the gold standard for segmental mandible reconstruction. BTE strategies offer promising alternatives.

Indexed as

bone tissue engineeringCAD/CAMfree flapmandible reconstructionmicrovascular

Identifiers

PMID31890875
PMCPMC6929581

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.