Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31890694›Full record

ReviewJournal of diabetes and metabolic disorders2019

Dietary antioxidative supplements and diabetic retinopathy; a systematic review.

Ozra Tabatabaei-Malazy, Edris Ardeshirlarijani, Nazli Namazi, Shekoufeh Nikfar, Reza Baradar Jalili, Bagher Larijani

Erratum issuedOpen access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of diabetes and metabolic disorders, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Research Progress of Coenzyme Q in Diabetes Mellitus and Its Common Complications.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Coenzyme Q10 and Endocrine Disorders: An Overview.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ozra Tabatabaei-Malazy1Non-Communicable Diseases Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Population Sciences Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Edris Ardeshirlarijani3Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, Canada.
Nazli Namazi4Diabetes Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinical Sciences Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Shekoufeh Nikfar2Endocrinology and Metabolism Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinical Sciences Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Reza Baradar Jalili8Department of Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia Canada.
Bagher Larijani2Endocrinology and Metabolism Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinical Sciences Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID 0000-0001-5386-7597
Tehran University of Medical Sciences · IRSimon Fraser University · CAUniversity of British Columbia · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThere is controversial data regarding the effects of dietary antioxidative supplements on diabetic retinopathy (DR). We conducted a systematic review of both observational and randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) to clarify whether they are effective or not.

methodsAll observational and RCTs conducted by antioxidative supplements on DR published up to 1 January 2018 in PubMed, Web of Sciences, Scopus and Cochrane Library databases were included. Exclusion criteria were animal studies, and studies conducted in Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), children or pregnant women. Main outcome measures were reporting the incidence or progression of DR in T2DM by assessment of visual fields, and measurements of oxidative and antioxidative biomarkers. The quality of reporting of included articles and risk of bias were assessed.

resultsFinally, we reached 14 observational studies and 7 RCTs that conducted on 256,259 subjects. Due to severe methodological heterogeneity, only qualitative synthesis was carried. All studies were reported a significantly lower level of antioxidants and higher level of oxidative stress biomarkers in DR compared with others. There was an inverse significant correlation between vitamin C and malondialdehyde (MDA) (r = -0.81) or DNA damage (r = -0.41). These figures were statistically significant between vitamin E and MDA (r = 0.77) or superoxide dismutase (r = 0.44). Coefficient of correlation between MDA and zinc (-0.82), coenzyme Q10 (0.56), and magnesium (-0.73) was significant. Multi-oxidants trials were shown non-significant beneficial effects on DR.

conclusionsAlthough our study supports the positive effects of antioxidative supplements on DR, more high quality studies are needed to confirm.

Indexed as

AntioxidantsDiabetic retinopathyOxidative stressType 2 diabetes mellitus

Identifiers

PMID31890694
PMCPMC6915253
OpenAlexW2971133027

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.