Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31890616›Full record

ArticleInternet interventions2019

Individually tailored internet treatment in routine care: A feasibility study.

Martin Kraepelien, Cecilia Svanborg, Lovisa Lallerstedt, Victoria Sennerstam, Nils Lindefors, Viktor Kaldo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Internet interventions, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Martin KraepelienDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Centre for Psychiatry Research, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Cecilia SvanborgDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Centre for Psychiatry Research, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Lovisa LallerstedtDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Division of Psychology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Victoria SennerstamDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Division of Psychology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Nils LindeforsDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Centre for Psychiatry Research, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Viktor KaldoDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Centre for Psychiatry Research, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Karolinska Institutet · SELinnaeus University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDisorder-specific internet treatment, based on cognitive-behavioral therapy, has been a part of routine psychiatric care in Sweden since 2007, provided at the Internet Psychiatry Clinic in Stockholm. Individually tailored treatments, with the opportunity to target more than one condition within the same treatment, has since then been evaluated in randomized trials with promising results. To introduce an individually tailored treatment into a clinical setting originally designed for disorder-specific processes creates challenges, such as how to choose the optimal treatment type for each patient.

methodsThe feasibility of a proposed new routine for assessment and initiation of either a disorder-specific or an individually tailored treatment was tested on patients self-referring to the Internet Psychiatry Clinic during three weeks (

resultsA majority (65%) of patients screened had at least 2 comorbid problem areas, although 25% of these comorbid patients that where allocated with the help of the proposed routine still initiated disorder-specific treatment. The proposed assessment routine functioned satisfactorily within the up and running internet clinic. The individually tailored treatment was promising regarding satisfaction, credibility, adherence, and preliminary reductions in symptoms. A notable challenge encountered was that the platform was not set up to assist with assessment process or outcome monitoring for individually tailored treatment.

conclusionsIt seems feasible to combine individually tailored internet treatment and disorder-specific internet treatment within the same internet clinic. The addition of tailored treatment may prove to increase the number of patients included in treatment.

Indexed as

AssessmentCSQ-8, Client Satisfaction Questionnaire – 8 item versionDisorder-specific treatmentDS, disorder-specificEQ-5D, EuroQol five-dimensional questionnaireGAD-7, Generalised Anxiety Disorder 7-item scaleGuided self-helpImplementationIndividually tailored treatmentInternet treatmentISI, Insomnia Severity IndexMADRS-S, Montgomery–Åsberg Depression Rating Scale – Self-ratedPDSS-SR, Panic Disorder Severity Scale – Self-ReportPHQ-9, Patient Health Questionnaire - 9 itemPSS-10, Perceived Stress Scale – 10 itemSD, standard deviationSPIN, Social Phobia InventoryWHODAS-2, World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2 - 12-item

Identifiers

PMID31890616
PMCPMC6926276
OpenAlexW2967623128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.