ArticleInternet interventions2019
Predictors of treatment response in a web-based intervention for cannabis users.
Article in Internet interventions, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Can We Predict Who Will Experience Adverse Events While Using Smoking Cessation Pharmacotherapy? A Secondary Analysis of the EAGLES Clinical Trial.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2025Trial
- Who responds to a multi-component treatment for cannabis use disorder? Using multivariable and machine learning models to classify treatment responders and non-responders.Addiction (Abingdon, England) · 2023Trial
- Correlates of treatment engagement and client outcomes: results of a randomised controlled trial of nabiximols for the treatment of cannabis use disorder.Substance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy · 2022Trial
- Evidence-based therapist guided introduction to online heavy cannabis use treatment in Canadian adults: a Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT).Journal of cannabis research · 2026Article
- The Impacts of Social Support and Relationship Characteristics on Commitment to Sobriety Among People in Opioid Use Disorder Recovery.Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs · 2022Article
- Environmental conditions, mobile digital culture, mobile usability, knowledge of app in COVID-19 risk mitigation: A structural equation model analysis.Smart health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2022Article
- Internet-based cognitive-behavioural therapy for tinnitus: secondary analysis to examine predictors of outcomes.BMJ open · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTrials demonstrate the effectiveness of web-based interventions for cannabis-related disorders. For further development of these interventions, it is of vital interest to identify user characteristics which predict treatment response.
methodsData from a randomized factorial trial on a web-based intervention for cannabis-users (n = 534) was reanalyzed. As potential predictors for later treatment response, 31 variables from the following categories were tested: socio-demographics, substance use and cognitive processing. The association of predictors and treatment outcome was analyzed using unbiased recursive partitioning and represented as classification tree. Predictive performance of the tree was assessed by comparing its cross-validated results to models derived with all-subsets logistic regression and random forest.
resultsGoal commitment (p < .001), the extent of self-reflection (p < .001), the preferred effect of cannabis (p = .005) and initial cannabis use (p = .015) significantly differentiate between successful and non-successful participants in all three analysis methods. The predictive accuracy of all three models is comparable and modest.
conclusionsParticipants who commit to quit using cannabis, who at least have moderate levels of self-reflection and who prefer mild intoxicating effects were most likely to respond to treatment. To predict treatment response on an individual level, the classification tree should only be used as one of several sources of information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.