Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31890610›Full record

ArticleInternet interventions2019

Development of the eTAP: A brief measure of attitudes and process in e-interventions for mental health.

Bonnie A Clough, Jessica A Eigeland, Imogen R Madden, Dale Rowland, Leanne M Casey

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Internet interventions, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05395312 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of Blended Stepped-care Mental Well-being Intervention for Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorChinese University of Hong KongRan2022 to 2023Enrolled360ConditionsMental Well-being, Mental Health Issue, Mental Health Wellness 1ArmsOnline blended stepped-care mental well-being platform
NCT05694507 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of Chatbot for Mental Well-being: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorChinese University of Hong KongRan2023 to 2023Enrolled293ConditionsMental Well-being, Mental Health LiteracyArmsMental Well-being Chatbot
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Combating Fear of Missing Out (FoMO) on Social Media: The FoMO-R Method.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bonnie A CloughSchool of Applied Psychology, Griffith University, Australia.
Jessica A EigelandSchool of Applied Psychology, Griffith University, Australia.
Imogen R MaddenSchool of Applied Psychology, Griffith University, Australia.
Dale RowlandSchool of Applied Psychology, Griffith University, Australia.
Leanne M CaseySchool of Applied Psychology, Griffith University, Australia.
Griffith University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundConsiderable evidence supports the efficacy of e-interventions for mental health treatment and support. However, client engagement and adherence to these interventions are less than optimal and remain poorly understood.

objectiveThe aim of the current study was to develop and investigate the psychometric properties of the e-Therapy Attitudes and Process questionnaire (eTAP). Based on the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB), the eTAP was designed to measure factors related to client engagement in e-interventions for mental health.

methodsParticipants were 220 adults who reported current use of an e-intervention for mental health support. Participants completed the eTAP and related measures, with a subsample of 49 participants completing a one-week follow up assessment.

resultsA 16-item version of the eTAP produced a clear four-factor structure, explaining 70.25% of variance. The factors were consistent with the TPB, namely, Intention, Subjective Norm, Attitudes, and Perceived Behavioural Control. Internal consistency of the total and subscales was high, and adequate to good one-week test retest reliability was found. Convergent and divergent validity of the total and subscales was supported, as was the predictive validity. Specifically, eTAP Intentions correctly predicted engagement in e-interventions with 84% accuracy and non-engagement with 74% accuracy.

conclusionsThe eTAP was developed as a measure of factors related to engagement and adherence with e-interventions for mental health. Psychometric investigation supported the validity and reliability of the eTAP. The eTAP may be a valuable tool to understand, predict, and guide interventions to increase engagement and adherence to e-interventions for mental health.

Indexed as

AdherenceDigital interventionsDropoutE-mental healthEngagementTheory of Planned Behaviour

Identifiers

PMID31890610
PMCPMC6926169
OpenAlexW2950610472

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.