ArticlePreventive medicine reports2020
Preferences for implementation of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP): Results from a survey of primary care providers.
Article in Preventive medicine reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed.
- An electronic health record-based strategy to increase PrEP decision-making among cisgender women in primary care: results of a randomized pilot study.BMC health services research · 2025Trial
- Article
- An exploratory study of physicians' familiarity, knowledge, and willingness to prescribe pre-exposure prophylaxis in the MENA region.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A qualitative study identifying implementation strategies using the i-PARIHS framework to increase access to pre-exposure prophylaxis at federally qualified health centers in Mississippi.Implementation science communications · 2024Article
- HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis programme preferences among sexually active HIV-negative transgender and gender diverse adults in the United States: a conjoint analysis.Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2024Article
- Psychiatrists' Experiences, Training Needs, and Preferences Regarding Prescription and Management of HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Within Psychiatric Care.Psychiatric research and clinical practice · 2024Article
- Individual and Health System Factors for Uptake of Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Among Young Black and Latino Gay Men.Journal of general internal medicine · 2023Article
- Considerations for PrEP Implementation at Federally Qualified Health Centers in Mississippi: Perspectives From Staff and Patients.AIDS education and prevention : official publication of the International Society for AIDS Education · 2023Article
- A PrEP Demonstration Project Using eHealth and Community Outreach to Justice-Involved Cisgender Women and Their Risk Networks.AIDS and behavior · 2022Article
- HIV PrEP services for MSM in China: a mixed-methods study.AIDS care · 2022Article
- Optimizing Provider Preexposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Training: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Recommendations from Providers Across the PrEP Implementation Cascade.AIDS and behavior · 2022Article
- Acceptability, Appropriateness, and Preliminary Effects of the PrEP Diffusion Training for Lay HIV Workers: Increased PrEP Knowledge, Decreased Stigma, and Diffusion of Innovation.AIDS and behavior · 2021Article
- Project SLIP: Implementation of a PrEP Screening and Linkage Intervention in Primary Care.AIDS and behavior · 2021Article
- Readiness to Provide Medications for Addiction Treatment in HIV Clinics: A Multisite Mixed-Methods Formative Evaluation.Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999) · 2021Article
- Addressing Unhealthy Alcohol Use and the HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Care Continuum in Primary Care: A Scoping Review.AIDS and behavior · 2021Article
- Knowledge needs for implementing HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis among primary care providers in a safety-net health system.Preventive medicine reports · 2020Article
- Working with HIV clinics to adopt addiction treatment using implementation facilitation (WHAT-IF?): Rationale and design for a hybrid type 3 effectiveness-implementation study.Contemporary clinical trials · 2020Article
- Understanding Intentions to Discuss Long-Acting Injectable Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis with Healthcare Providers Among Black and Hispanic Gay and Bisexual Men in Texas.Journal of the International Association of Providers of AIDS CareArticle
- Primary Care Provider HIV PrEP Knowledge, Attitudes, and Prescribing Habits: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Late Adopters in Rural and Suburban Practice.Journal of primary care & community healthArticle
- HIV Exposure Prophylaxis Delivery in a Low-barrier Substance Use Disorder Bridge Clinic during a Local HIV Outbreak at the Onset of the COVID-19 Pandemic.Journal of addiction medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Primary care physicians (PCPs) are critical for promoting HIV prevention by prescribing pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). Yet, there are limited data regarding PCP's preferred approaches for PrEP implementation. In 2015, we conducted an online survey of PCPs' PrEP prescribing and implementation. Participants were general internists recruited from a national professional organization. We examined provider and practice characteristics and perceived implementation barriers and facilitators associated with preferred models for PrEP implementation. Among 240 participants, the majority (85%) favored integrating PrEP into primary care, either by training all providers ("all trained") (42%) or having an onsite PrEP specialist ("on-site specialist") (43%). Only 15% preferred referring patients out of the practice to a specialist ("refer out"). Compared to those who preferred to "refer out," participants who preferred the "all trained" model were more likely to spend most of their time delivering direct patient care and to practice in the Northeast. Compared to participants who preferred the "refer out" or on-site specialist" models, PCPs preferring the all trained model were less likely to perceive lack of clinic PrEP guidelines/protocols as a barrier to PrEP. Most PCPs favored integrating PrEP into primary care by either training all providers or having an on-site specialist. Time devoted to clinical care and geography may influence preferences for PrEP implementation. Establishing clinic-specific PrEP protocols may promote on-site PrEP implementation. Future studies should focus on evaluating the effectiveness of different PrEP implementation models on PrEP delivery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.